Cargando…
Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project)
OBJECTIVES: No consensus criteria describe the medical eligibility of the patients to intermediate care units (IMCUs). In this first part of the UNISURC project, we aimed to develop criteria based on a consensus of physicians from the main specialties involved in IMCU admission decisions. DESIGN: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37487677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072836 |
_version_ | 1785078612449296384 |
---|---|
author | Misset, Benoît Aegerter, Philippe Boulkedid, Rym Alberti, Corinne Baillard, Christophe Guidet, Bertrand Beaussier, Marc |
author_facet | Misset, Benoît Aegerter, Philippe Boulkedid, Rym Alberti, Corinne Baillard, Christophe Guidet, Bertrand Beaussier, Marc |
author_sort | Misset, Benoît |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: No consensus criteria describe the medical eligibility of the patients to intermediate care units (IMCUs). In this first part of the UNISURC project, we aimed to develop criteria based on a consensus of physicians from the main specialties involved in IMCU admission decisions. DESIGN: We selected criteria from IMCU literature, scoring systems and intensive care unit nursing workload. We submitted these criteria to a panel of experts in a Delphi survey. We used a two-round Delphi survey procedure to assess the validity and feasibility of each criterion. SETTING: Medical practitioners in either public or private French institutions and proposed by the national scientific societies of anaesthesiology, emergency medicine and intensive care. The Delphi rounds took place in 2015–2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Validity and feasibility of the proposed criteria; uniformity of the judgement across the primary specialty and the hospital category of the responders. RESULTS: The criteria submitted to vote were classified as one of: chronic factor (CF); acute factor (AF); specific pathway (SP); nursing activity (NA) and hospital environment (HE). Of 189 experts invited, 81 (41%) responded to the first round and 62 of them (76%) responded to the second round. A definite selection of 63 items was made, distributed across 6 CF, 18 AF, 31 SP, 3 NA and 5 HE. Validity and feasibility were influenced by the specialty or the public/private status of the institution of the responders for a few items. CONCLUSION: We created a set of 63 consensus criteria with acceptable validity and feasibility to assess the medical eligibility of the patients to IMCUs. The second part of the UNISURC project will assess the distribution of each criterion in a prospective multicentre national cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02590172. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103736782023-07-28 Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) Misset, Benoît Aegerter, Philippe Boulkedid, Rym Alberti, Corinne Baillard, Christophe Guidet, Bertrand Beaussier, Marc BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: No consensus criteria describe the medical eligibility of the patients to intermediate care units (IMCUs). In this first part of the UNISURC project, we aimed to develop criteria based on a consensus of physicians from the main specialties involved in IMCU admission decisions. DESIGN: We selected criteria from IMCU literature, scoring systems and intensive care unit nursing workload. We submitted these criteria to a panel of experts in a Delphi survey. We used a two-round Delphi survey procedure to assess the validity and feasibility of each criterion. SETTING: Medical practitioners in either public or private French institutions and proposed by the national scientific societies of anaesthesiology, emergency medicine and intensive care. The Delphi rounds took place in 2015–2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Validity and feasibility of the proposed criteria; uniformity of the judgement across the primary specialty and the hospital category of the responders. RESULTS: The criteria submitted to vote were classified as one of: chronic factor (CF); acute factor (AF); specific pathway (SP); nursing activity (NA) and hospital environment (HE). Of 189 experts invited, 81 (41%) responded to the first round and 62 of them (76%) responded to the second round. A definite selection of 63 items was made, distributed across 6 CF, 18 AF, 31 SP, 3 NA and 5 HE. Validity and feasibility were influenced by the specialty or the public/private status of the institution of the responders for a few items. CONCLUSION: We created a set of 63 consensus criteria with acceptable validity and feasibility to assess the medical eligibility of the patients to IMCUs. The second part of the UNISURC project will assess the distribution of each criterion in a prospective multicentre national cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02590172. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10373678/ /pubmed/37487677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072836 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Misset, Benoît Aegerter, Philippe Boulkedid, Rym Alberti, Corinne Baillard, Christophe Guidet, Bertrand Beaussier, Marc Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title | Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title_full | Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title_fullStr | Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title_full_unstemmed | Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title_short | Construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in France: a Delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the UNISURC project) |
title_sort | construction of reference criteria to admit patients to intermediate care units in france: a delphi survey of intensivists, anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine practitioners (first part of the unisurc project) |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37487677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT missetbenoit constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT aegerterphilippe constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT boulkedidrym constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT alberticorinne constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT baillardchristophe constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT guidetbertrand constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject AT beaussiermarc constructionofreferencecriteriatoadmitpatientstointermediatecareunitsinfranceadelphisurveyofintensivistsanaesthesiologistsandemergencymedicinepractitionersfirstpartoftheunisurcproject |