Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study
AIM: A lot of herbal and medicated toothpastes having natural and antisensitivity properties are creating niches for themselves in the market. However, toothpaste containing high content of abrasives can be harmful to the teeth. The present in vitro study was conducted to assess the abrasiveness of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2576 |
_version_ | 1785078630556106752 |
---|---|
author | Priyam, Shefalika Sankeshwari, Roopali Jalihal, Sagar Singhal, Richa Vyavahare, Supriya Ankola, Anil V |
author_facet | Priyam, Shefalika Sankeshwari, Roopali Jalihal, Sagar Singhal, Richa Vyavahare, Supriya Ankola, Anil V |
author_sort | Priyam, Shefalika |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: A lot of herbal and medicated toothpastes having natural and antisensitivity properties are creating niches for themselves in the market. However, toothpaste containing high content of abrasives can be harmful to the teeth. The present in vitro study was conducted to assess the abrasiveness of three commercially available dentifrices on human-extracted anterior teeth on sound and demineralized enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 freshly extracted teeth were mounted on acrylic resin and randomly divided into three groups (group I, Colgate; II, Glister; and III, Dant Kanti). Each group consisted of one test tooth (partially) and one control tooth (completely) covered with nail varnish. The study had two phases. Phase 1—baseline average roughness (Ra) value was assessed with a profilometer of all the samples. Phase 2—further, teeth were immersed in the demineralizing solution for 4 days to allow the formation of an artificial carious lesion. Tooth brushing was performed by a customized automated toothbrushing model on all the teeth for 28 days. Ra value was again evaluated with Profilometer. RESULT: Data were analyzed, and a statistically significant result was observed with demineralized teeth in all three groups (p = 0.005). The intragroup comparison showed a significant difference with demineralized teeth of Colgate and Dant Kanti, (p =0.018) and (p =0.027), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in demineralized teeth of glister and sound teeth of all three groups. CONCLUSION: Glister was found to be the least abrasive of all three toothpastes, followed by Dant Kanti and Colgate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The particle size of the ingredients used in manufacturing toothpaste can lead to abrasion of the teeth. This, in combination with the hard bristles, can cause more harm to the teeth than good. The current study has compared the abrasive potential of three commercially available kinds of toothpaste. Hence daily use of these commercially available dental products should be used cautiously. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Priyam S, Sankeshwari R, Jalihal S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(2):264-269. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103737662023-07-28 Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study Priyam, Shefalika Sankeshwari, Roopali Jalihal, Sagar Singhal, Richa Vyavahare, Supriya Ankola, Anil V Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: A lot of herbal and medicated toothpastes having natural and antisensitivity properties are creating niches for themselves in the market. However, toothpaste containing high content of abrasives can be harmful to the teeth. The present in vitro study was conducted to assess the abrasiveness of three commercially available dentifrices on human-extracted anterior teeth on sound and demineralized enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 freshly extracted teeth were mounted on acrylic resin and randomly divided into three groups (group I, Colgate; II, Glister; and III, Dant Kanti). Each group consisted of one test tooth (partially) and one control tooth (completely) covered with nail varnish. The study had two phases. Phase 1—baseline average roughness (Ra) value was assessed with a profilometer of all the samples. Phase 2—further, teeth were immersed in the demineralizing solution for 4 days to allow the formation of an artificial carious lesion. Tooth brushing was performed by a customized automated toothbrushing model on all the teeth for 28 days. Ra value was again evaluated with Profilometer. RESULT: Data were analyzed, and a statistically significant result was observed with demineralized teeth in all three groups (p = 0.005). The intragroup comparison showed a significant difference with demineralized teeth of Colgate and Dant Kanti, (p =0.018) and (p =0.027), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in demineralized teeth of glister and sound teeth of all three groups. CONCLUSION: Glister was found to be the least abrasive of all three toothpastes, followed by Dant Kanti and Colgate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The particle size of the ingredients used in manufacturing toothpaste can lead to abrasion of the teeth. This, in combination with the hard bristles, can cause more harm to the teeth than good. The current study has compared the abrasive potential of three commercially available kinds of toothpaste. Hence daily use of these commercially available dental products should be used cautiously. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Priyam S, Sankeshwari R, Jalihal S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(2):264-269. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10373766/ /pubmed/37519980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2576 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Priyam, Shefalika Sankeshwari, Roopali Jalihal, Sagar Singhal, Richa Vyavahare, Supriya Ankola, Anil V Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasiveness among Three Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of abrasiveness among three dentifrices: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT priyamshefalika comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy AT sankeshwariroopali comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy AT jalihalsagar comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy AT singhalricha comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy AT vyavaharesupriya comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy AT ankolaanilv comparativeevaluationofabrasivenessamongthreedentifricesaninvitrostudy |