Cargando…
Deliberative panels as a source of public knowledge: A large-sample test of the Citizens’ Initiative Review
Evolving US media and political systems, coupled with escalating misinformation campaigns, have left the public divided over objective facts featured in policy debates. The public also has lost much of its confidence in the institutions designed to adjudicate those epistemic debates. To counter this...
Autores principales: | Gastil, John, Ársælsson, Kristinn Már, Knobloch, Katherine R., Brinker, David L., Richards, Robert C., Reedy, Justin, Burkhalter, Stephanie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288188 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment
por: Herzog, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
“Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate
por: Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering
por: Bellamy, Rob, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
por: Reedy, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Deliberative dialogue on euthanasia in girls, boys and adolescents. Prequel to the Cabildo Ciudadano (Citizen Council) carried out in Colombia
por: Pinzón-Segura, María Camila, et al.
Publicado: (2022)