Cargando…

Exploring the concordance of recommendations across guidelines on chest imaging for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19: A proposed methodological approach based on a case study

OBJECTIVE: To describe a methodological approach to explore the concordance of recommendations across guidelines and its application to the case of the WHO recommendations on chest imaging for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We followed a methodological approach a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaacoub, Sally, Chamseddine, Fatimah, Jaber, Farah, Blazic, Ivana, Frija, Guy, Akl, Elie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288359
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe a methodological approach to explore the concordance of recommendations across guidelines and its application to the case of the WHO recommendations on chest imaging for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We followed a methodological approach applied to a case study that included: defining the ‘reference guideline’ (i.e., the WHO guidance) and the ‘reference recommendations’; searching for ‘related guidelines’ and identifying ‘related recommendations’; constructing the PICO for the recommendations; assessing the matching of the PICO of each related recommendation to the PICO corresponding reference recommendation; and assessing the concordance between the PICO-matching recommendations. RESULTS: We identified a total of 89 related recommendations from 22 related guidelines. Out of the 89 related recommendations, 43 partly matched and 1 entirely matched one of the reference recommendations, and out of these, 8 were concordant with one of the reference recommendations. When considering the seven reference recommendations, they had a median of 12 related recommendations (range 3–17), a median of 7 PICO-matching recommendations (range 0–13), and a median of 1 concordant recommendation (range 0–4). CONCLUSION: Following a detailed methodological approach, we were able to explore the concordance between our reference recommendations and related recommendations from other guidelines. A relatively low percentage of recommendations was concordant.