Cargando…

3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline

We aimed to validate the metric accuracy of a 3-dimensional (3D) facial scanner (FS) and an intraoral scanner (IOS) in capturing the nasolabial region in ex vivo unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) models. The nasolabial region of 10 UCLP models was scanned using a 3D FS as well as an IOS and a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olmos, Manuel, Matta, Ragai, Buchbender, Mayte, Jaeckel, Fabian, Nobis, Christopher-Philipp, Weber, Manuel, Kesting, Marco, Lutz, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39352-7
_version_ 1785078816421445632
author Olmos, Manuel
Matta, Ragai
Buchbender, Mayte
Jaeckel, Fabian
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Weber, Manuel
Kesting, Marco
Lutz, Rainer
author_facet Olmos, Manuel
Matta, Ragai
Buchbender, Mayte
Jaeckel, Fabian
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Weber, Manuel
Kesting, Marco
Lutz, Rainer
author_sort Olmos, Manuel
collection PubMed
description We aimed to validate the metric accuracy of a 3-dimensional (3D) facial scanner (FS) and an intraoral scanner (IOS) in capturing the nasolabial region in ex vivo unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) models. The nasolabial region of 10 UCLP models was scanned using a 3D FS as well as an IOS and a previously validated stationary 3D scanner as a reference. Intraoral scan was performed directly on the UCLP models. In order to apply the FS on the models, they were embedded in a 3D printed sample face. Both test groups were aligned to the reference by applying a section-based best-fit algorithm. Subsequent analysis of the metric deviation from the reference was performed with a 3D analysis tool. Mean distance and integrated distance served as main parameters for surface and volume comparison. Point comparison served as an additional parameter. Statistical analysis was carried out using t-test for unconnected samples. Considering mean distance and integrated distance as main parameters for 3D evaluation of the scanner’s accuracy, FS and IOS differ significantly in their metric precision in scanning the cleft model compared to the reference. The IOS proved to be significantly more accurate than the FS compared to the previously described stationary 3D scanner as reference and validated baseline. Further validation of the tested IOS and FS for 3D assessment of the nasolabial region is presented by adding the previously validated ATOS III Triple Scan blue light scanner as a reference. The IOS shows, compared to a validated baseline scan, significantly higher metric precision in experimental cleft model scanning. The collected data provides a basis for clinical application of the IOS for 3D assessment of the nasolabial region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10374634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103746342023-07-29 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline Olmos, Manuel Matta, Ragai Buchbender, Mayte Jaeckel, Fabian Nobis, Christopher-Philipp Weber, Manuel Kesting, Marco Lutz, Rainer Sci Rep Article We aimed to validate the metric accuracy of a 3-dimensional (3D) facial scanner (FS) and an intraoral scanner (IOS) in capturing the nasolabial region in ex vivo unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) models. The nasolabial region of 10 UCLP models was scanned using a 3D FS as well as an IOS and a previously validated stationary 3D scanner as a reference. Intraoral scan was performed directly on the UCLP models. In order to apply the FS on the models, they were embedded in a 3D printed sample face. Both test groups were aligned to the reference by applying a section-based best-fit algorithm. Subsequent analysis of the metric deviation from the reference was performed with a 3D analysis tool. Mean distance and integrated distance served as main parameters for surface and volume comparison. Point comparison served as an additional parameter. Statistical analysis was carried out using t-test for unconnected samples. Considering mean distance and integrated distance as main parameters for 3D evaluation of the scanner’s accuracy, FS and IOS differ significantly in their metric precision in scanning the cleft model compared to the reference. The IOS proved to be significantly more accurate than the FS compared to the previously described stationary 3D scanner as reference and validated baseline. Further validation of the tested IOS and FS for 3D assessment of the nasolabial region is presented by adding the previously validated ATOS III Triple Scan blue light scanner as a reference. The IOS shows, compared to a validated baseline scan, significantly higher metric precision in experimental cleft model scanning. The collected data provides a basis for clinical application of the IOS for 3D assessment of the nasolabial region. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10374634/ /pubmed/37500683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39352-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Olmos, Manuel
Matta, Ragai
Buchbender, Mayte
Jaeckel, Fabian
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Weber, Manuel
Kesting, Marco
Lutz, Rainer
3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title_full 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title_fullStr 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title_full_unstemmed 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title_short 3D assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
title_sort 3d assessment of the nasolabial region in cleft models comparing an intraoral and a facial scanner to a validated baseline
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39352-7
work_keys_str_mv AT olmosmanuel 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT mattaragai 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT buchbendermayte 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT jaeckelfabian 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT nobischristopherphilipp 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT webermanuel 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT kestingmarco 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline
AT lutzrainer 3dassessmentofthenasolabialregionincleftmodelscomparinganintraoralandafacialscannertoavalidatedbaseline