Cargando…
Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9 |
_version_ | 1785078824495480832 |
---|---|
author | Chahal, Baldev Aydın, Abdullatif Amin, Mohammad S. Ali Ong, Kelly Khan, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar |
author_facet | Chahal, Baldev Aydın, Abdullatif Amin, Mohammad S. Ali Ong, Kelly Khan, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar |
author_sort | Chahal, Baldev |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of training required. This systematic review aims to assess psychomotor skill transfer to the robot in clinical and simulated settings. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were systematically searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2021 alongside website searching and citation chaining. Article screening, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included simulator performance metrics or in the case of clinical studies, peri- and post-operative metrics. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies were judged to be at high or moderate overall risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Two of the three studies assessing open surgical skill transfer found evidence of successful skill transfer while nine of twenty-seven studies evaluating laparoscopic skill transfer found no evidence. Skill transfer from both modalities is most apparent when advanced robotic tasks are performed in the initial phase of the learning curve but quality and methodological limitations of the existing literature prevent definitive conclusions. The impact of incorporating laparoscopic simulation into robotic training curricula and on the cost effectiveness of training should be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10374669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103746692023-07-29 Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review Chahal, Baldev Aydın, Abdullatif Amin, Mohammad S. Ali Ong, Kelly Khan, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar J Robot Surg Review Article Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of training required. This systematic review aims to assess psychomotor skill transfer to the robot in clinical and simulated settings. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were systematically searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2021 alongside website searching and citation chaining. Article screening, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included simulator performance metrics or in the case of clinical studies, peri- and post-operative metrics. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies were judged to be at high or moderate overall risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Two of the three studies assessing open surgical skill transfer found evidence of successful skill transfer while nine of twenty-seven studies evaluating laparoscopic skill transfer found no evidence. Skill transfer from both modalities is most apparent when advanced robotic tasks are performed in the initial phase of the learning curve but quality and methodological limitations of the existing literature prevent definitive conclusions. The impact of incorporating laparoscopic simulation into robotic training curricula and on the cost effectiveness of training should be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9. Springer London 2022-11-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10374669/ /pubmed/36418717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chahal, Baldev Aydın, Abdullatif Amin, Mohammad S. Ali Ong, Kelly Khan, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title | Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chahalbaldev transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT aydınabdullatif transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT aminmohammadsali transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT ongkelly transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT khanazhar transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT khanmuhammadshamim transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT ahmedkamran transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview AT dasguptaprokar transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview |