Cargando…

Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review

Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chahal, Baldev, Aydın, Abdullatif, Amin, Mohammad S. Ali, Ong, Kelly, Khan, Azhar, Khan, Muhammad Shamim, Ahmed, Kamran, Dasgupta, Prokar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9
_version_ 1785078824495480832
author Chahal, Baldev
Aydın, Abdullatif
Amin, Mohammad S. Ali
Ong, Kelly
Khan, Azhar
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_facet Chahal, Baldev
Aydın, Abdullatif
Amin, Mohammad S. Ali
Ong, Kelly
Khan, Azhar
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_sort Chahal, Baldev
collection PubMed
description Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of training required. This systematic review aims to assess psychomotor skill transfer to the robot in clinical and simulated settings. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were systematically searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2021 alongside website searching and citation chaining. Article screening, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included simulator performance metrics or in the case of clinical studies, peri- and post-operative metrics. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies were judged to be at high or moderate overall risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Two of the three studies assessing open surgical skill transfer found evidence of successful skill transfer while nine of twenty-seven studies evaluating laparoscopic skill transfer found no evidence. Skill transfer from both modalities is most apparent when advanced robotic tasks are performed in the initial phase of the learning curve but quality and methodological limitations of the existing literature prevent definitive conclusions. The impact of incorporating laparoscopic simulation into robotic training curricula and on the cost effectiveness of training should be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10374669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103746692023-07-29 Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review Chahal, Baldev Aydın, Abdullatif Amin, Mohammad S. Ali Ong, Kelly Khan, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar J Robot Surg Review Article Due to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of training required. This systematic review aims to assess psychomotor skill transfer to the robot in clinical and simulated settings. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were systematically searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2021 alongside website searching and citation chaining. Article screening, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included simulator performance metrics or in the case of clinical studies, peri- and post-operative metrics. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies were judged to be at high or moderate overall risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Two of the three studies assessing open surgical skill transfer found evidence of successful skill transfer while nine of twenty-seven studies evaluating laparoscopic skill transfer found no evidence. Skill transfer from both modalities is most apparent when advanced robotic tasks are performed in the initial phase of the learning curve but quality and methodological limitations of the existing literature prevent definitive conclusions. The impact of incorporating laparoscopic simulation into robotic training curricula and on the cost effectiveness of training should be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9. Springer London 2022-11-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10374669/ /pubmed/36418717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Chahal, Baldev
Aydın, Abdullatif
Amin, Mohammad S. Ali
Ong, Kelly
Khan, Azhar
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title_full Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title_short Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
title_sort transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chahalbaldev transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT aydınabdullatif transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT aminmohammadsali transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT ongkelly transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT khanazhar transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT khanmuhammadshamim transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT ahmedkamran transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview
AT dasguptaprokar transferofopenandlaparoscopicskillstoroboticsurgeryasystematicreview