Cargando…

Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes

PURPOSE: This study compared the in vitro/benchtop and in vivo mechanical properties and host biologic response to ovine rumen-derived/polymer mesh hybrid OviTex™ with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix Strattice™ Firm. METHODS: OviTex 2S Resorbable (OviTex 2S-R) and Strattice morphology were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, J., Stec, E., Edwards, M., Connell, T., Sandor, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37031315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0
_version_ 1785078832007479296
author Lombardi, J.
Stec, E.
Edwards, M.
Connell, T.
Sandor, M.
author_facet Lombardi, J.
Stec, E.
Edwards, M.
Connell, T.
Sandor, M.
author_sort Lombardi, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study compared the in vitro/benchtop and in vivo mechanical properties and host biologic response to ovine rumen-derived/polymer mesh hybrid OviTex™ with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix Strattice™ Firm. METHODS: OviTex 2S Resorbable (OviTex 2S-R) and Strattice morphology were examined in vitro using histology and scanning electron microscopy; mechanical properties were assessed via tensile test; in vivo host biologic response and explant mechanics were evaluated in a rodent subcutaneous model. Separately, OviTex 1S Permanent (OviTex 1S-P) and Strattice were evaluated in a primate abdominal wall repair model. RESULTS: OviTex 2S-R demonstrated layer separation, whereas Strattice retained its structural integrity and demonstrated higher maximum load than OviTex 2S-R out-of-package (124.8 ± 11.1 N/cm vs 37.9 ± 5.5 N/cm, p < 0.001), 24 h (55.7 ± 7.4 N/cm vs 5.6 ± 3.8 N/cm, p < 0.001), 48 h (45.3 ± 14.8 N/cm vs 2.8 ± 2.6 N/cm, p = 0.003), and 72 h (29.2 ± 10.5 N/cm vs 3.2 ± 3.1 N/cm, p = 0.006) following collagenase digestion. In rodents, inflammatory cell infiltration was observed between OviTex 2S-R layers, while Strattice induced a minimal inflammatory response. Strattice retained higher maximum load at 3 (46.3 ± 27.4 N/cm vs 9.5 ± 3.2 N/cm, p = 0.041) and 6 weeks (28.6 ± 14.1 N/cm vs 7.0 ± 3.0 N/cm, p = 0.029). In primates, OviTex 1S-P exhibited loss of composite mesh integrity whereas Strattice integrated into host tissue with minimal inflammation and retained higher maximum load at 1 month than OviTex 1S-P (66.8 ± 43.4 N/cm vs 9.6 ± 4.4 N/cm; p = 0.151). CONCLUSIONS: Strattice retained greater mechanical strength as shown by lower susceptibility to collagenase degradation than OviTex 2S-R in vitro, as well as higher maximum load and improved host biologic response than OviTex 2S-R in rodents and OviTex 1S-P in primates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10374700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103747002023-07-29 Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes Lombardi, J. Stec, E. Edwards, M. Connell, T. Sandor, M. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: This study compared the in vitro/benchtop and in vivo mechanical properties and host biologic response to ovine rumen-derived/polymer mesh hybrid OviTex™ with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix Strattice™ Firm. METHODS: OviTex 2S Resorbable (OviTex 2S-R) and Strattice morphology were examined in vitro using histology and scanning electron microscopy; mechanical properties were assessed via tensile test; in vivo host biologic response and explant mechanics were evaluated in a rodent subcutaneous model. Separately, OviTex 1S Permanent (OviTex 1S-P) and Strattice were evaluated in a primate abdominal wall repair model. RESULTS: OviTex 2S-R demonstrated layer separation, whereas Strattice retained its structural integrity and demonstrated higher maximum load than OviTex 2S-R out-of-package (124.8 ± 11.1 N/cm vs 37.9 ± 5.5 N/cm, p < 0.001), 24 h (55.7 ± 7.4 N/cm vs 5.6 ± 3.8 N/cm, p < 0.001), 48 h (45.3 ± 14.8 N/cm vs 2.8 ± 2.6 N/cm, p = 0.003), and 72 h (29.2 ± 10.5 N/cm vs 3.2 ± 3.1 N/cm, p = 0.006) following collagenase digestion. In rodents, inflammatory cell infiltration was observed between OviTex 2S-R layers, while Strattice induced a minimal inflammatory response. Strattice retained higher maximum load at 3 (46.3 ± 27.4 N/cm vs 9.5 ± 3.2 N/cm, p = 0.041) and 6 weeks (28.6 ± 14.1 N/cm vs 7.0 ± 3.0 N/cm, p = 0.029). In primates, OviTex 1S-P exhibited loss of composite mesh integrity whereas Strattice integrated into host tissue with minimal inflammation and retained higher maximum load at 1 month than OviTex 1S-P (66.8 ± 43.4 N/cm vs 9.6 ± 4.4 N/cm; p = 0.151). CONCLUSIONS: Strattice retained greater mechanical strength as shown by lower susceptibility to collagenase degradation than OviTex 2S-R in vitro, as well as higher maximum load and improved host biologic response than OviTex 2S-R in rodents and OviTex 1S-P in primates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0. Springer Paris 2023-04-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10374700/ /pubmed/37031315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lombardi, J.
Stec, E.
Edwards, M.
Connell, T.
Sandor, M.
Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title_full Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title_fullStr Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title_short Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes
title_sort comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to ovitex™ and strattice™ surgical meshes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37031315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardij comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesandhosttissueresponsetoovitexandstratticesurgicalmeshes
AT stece comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesandhosttissueresponsetoovitexandstratticesurgicalmeshes
AT edwardsm comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesandhosttissueresponsetoovitexandstratticesurgicalmeshes
AT connellt comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesandhosttissueresponsetoovitexandstratticesurgicalmeshes
AT sandorm comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesandhosttissueresponsetoovitexandstratticesurgicalmeshes