Cargando…

The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome modulators, such as fecal microbiome transplants (FMTs), are being considered as supplements to standard immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to improve efficacy. This systematic review aims to assess the study design and outcomes of clinical trials t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatt, Anjali, Haslam, Alyson, Prasad, Vinay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04656-8
_version_ 1785078839838244864
author Bhatt, Anjali
Haslam, Alyson
Prasad, Vinay
author_facet Bhatt, Anjali
Haslam, Alyson
Prasad, Vinay
author_sort Bhatt, Anjali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome modulators, such as fecal microbiome transplants (FMTs), are being considered as supplements to standard immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to improve efficacy. This systematic review aims to assess the study design and outcomes of clinical trials that use FMTs to enhance ICI treatment. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Embase using search terms that included names of ICIs and gastrointestinal microbiome. A first search identified interventional trials, and the second search identified interventional, retrospective, and observational studies. RESULTS: The search for interventional trials produced 205 articles, 3 of which met the inclusion criteria. All studies had sample sizes ranging between 10 and 30 participants. 2 of the studies were single-arm studies with no control arm. One study reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 3 out of 15 (20%), a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 7 months. The second study reported 1 complete response out of 10 (10%) and 2 partial responses out of 10 (20%). The third study reported an ORR of 58% vs. 20%, a median PFS of 12.7 months vs. 2.5 months in patients receiving nivolumab–ipilimumab plus CBM588 compared with patients receiving nivolumab–ipilimumab alone respectively, and an undefined median OS. CONCLUSION: Current studies on the microbiome modulators with ICI use are limited in study design. Future clinical trials should be randomized, use larger sample sizes, and use an appropriate control arm to better ascertain the clinical effect of the GI microbiome on ICI treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-04656-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10374733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103747332023-07-29 The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review Bhatt, Anjali Haslam, Alyson Prasad, Vinay J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome modulators, such as fecal microbiome transplants (FMTs), are being considered as supplements to standard immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to improve efficacy. This systematic review aims to assess the study design and outcomes of clinical trials that use FMTs to enhance ICI treatment. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Embase using search terms that included names of ICIs and gastrointestinal microbiome. A first search identified interventional trials, and the second search identified interventional, retrospective, and observational studies. RESULTS: The search for interventional trials produced 205 articles, 3 of which met the inclusion criteria. All studies had sample sizes ranging between 10 and 30 participants. 2 of the studies were single-arm studies with no control arm. One study reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 3 out of 15 (20%), a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 7 months. The second study reported 1 complete response out of 10 (10%) and 2 partial responses out of 10 (20%). The third study reported an ORR of 58% vs. 20%, a median PFS of 12.7 months vs. 2.5 months in patients receiving nivolumab–ipilimumab plus CBM588 compared with patients receiving nivolumab–ipilimumab alone respectively, and an undefined median OS. CONCLUSION: Current studies on the microbiome modulators with ICI use are limited in study design. Future clinical trials should be randomized, use larger sample sizes, and use an appropriate control arm to better ascertain the clinical effect of the GI microbiome on ICI treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-04656-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10374733/ /pubmed/36928160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04656-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Bhatt, Anjali
Haslam, Alyson
Prasad, Vinay
The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title_full The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title_short The effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
title_sort effect of gastrointestinal microbiome supplementation on immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04656-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattanjali theeffectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview
AT haslamalyson theeffectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview
AT prasadvinay theeffectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview
AT bhattanjali effectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview
AT haslamalyson effectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview
AT prasadvinay effectofgastrointestinalmicrobiomesupplementationonimmunecheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyasystematicreview