Cargando…

Clinical and radiological comparison between partial and complete resection of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients with mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament: a controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The pathology of a mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament (MDACL) has been mentioned in several publications but due to its rare incidence it is not a well-known pathology. Partial or complete resection of the ACL is the option of choice after failed non-surgical treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oehler, N., Haenle, M., Vogt, S., Blanke, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36574067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04741-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The pathology of a mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament (MDACL) has been mentioned in several publications but due to its rare incidence it is not a well-known pathology. Partial or complete resection of the ACL is the option of choice after failed non-surgical treatment. However, the success rate of both surgical techniques and the subsequent risk of an ACL instability is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome between partial resection and complete resection of the ACL in patients with MDACL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MDACL verified by MRI and persistent knee pain were treated by partial (Group I) or complete resection (Group II) of the ACL and were included in a controlled clinical trial after unsuccessful conservative treatment for at least 6 months. Demographic, clinical and radiological data including the thickness of ACL, ACL/intercondylar ratio, patient’s age at the time of surgery, the presenting symptoms, range of motion and ligament stability assessed by the ACL ligament score (Lachman test) were collected. In addition, Tegner activity score and Lysholm score were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up after a minimum of 12 months. RESULTS: At final follow-up with a mean of 16.8 ± 8.8 months (range 12–41; Group I: 18.3 ± 9.7 vs. Group II: 15.3 ± 8.0; ns), all patients were pain free. Postoperatively, positive Lachman tests were noted in all patients (100%) in Group II (n = 5 patients with grade II and n = 5 patients with grade III). In Group I, 8 patients (80%) showed a negative Lachman test (grade I) and 2 patients (20%) a slightly elongated Lachman test with a firm stop (grade II). The mean knee flexion at follow-up examination was 132° ± 7° (range 120°–140°; Group I: 129° ± 9° vs. Group II: 135° ± 4°; ns). In pairwise comparison, flexion angle increased significantly in both groups (Group I: p = 0.0124 and Group II: p < 0.001). Pairwise comparison of thickness of the ACL and ACL/intercondylar ratio prior to and post-surgery in Group I showed non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Both arthroscopic debridement and complete resection of the ACL lead to improvement of clinical and radiological findings in isolated MDACL. However, complete resection of the ACL will result in higher instability. Therefore, partial resection might be the better treatment option, especially in young patients with MDACL.