Cargando…
Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilizatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669 |
_version_ | 1785078897842323456 |
---|---|
author | Mc Mahon, A. Griffin, S. Gorman, Emma Lennon, Aoife Kielthy, Stephen Flannery, Andrea Cherian, Bindu Sam Josy, Minu Marsh, B. |
author_facet | Mc Mahon, A. Griffin, S. Gorman, Emma Lennon, Aoife Kielthy, Stephen Flannery, Andrea Cherian, Bindu Sam Josy, Minu Marsh, B. |
author_sort | Mc Mahon, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilization, with a paucity of information on quality of life following tracheostomy. METHODS: Single center retrospective study including all patients requiring tracheostomy from 2017 to 2019. Information collected on demographics, severity of illness, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, discharge disposition, sedation, time to vocalization, swallow and mobilization. Outcomes were compared for early versus late tracheostomy (early = <day 10) and age category (≤ 65 vs ≥ 66 years). RESULTS: In total, 304 patients were included and 71% male, median age 59, APACHE II score 17. Median ICU and hospital LOS 16 and 56 days, respectively. ICU and hospital mortality 9.9% and 22.4%. Median time to tracheostomy 8 days, 8.55% open. Following tracheostomy, median days of sedation was 0, time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) 1 day (94% of patients achieving this), ventilator-free breathing (VFB) 5 days (72%), speaking valve 7 days (60%), dynamic sitting 5 days (64%), and swallow assessment 16 days (73%). Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS (13 vs 26 days, P < .0001), reduced sedation (6 vs 12 days, P < .0001), faster transition to level 2 care (6 vs 10 days, P < .003), NIV (1 vs 2 days, P < .003), and VFB (4 vs 7 days, P < .005). Older patients received less sedation, had higher APACHE II scores and mortality (36.1%) and 18.5% were discharged home. Median time to VFB was 6 days (63.9%), speaking valve 7 days (64.7%), swallow assessment 20.5 days (66.7%), and dynamic sitting 5 days (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Patient-centered outcomes are a worthy goal to consider when selecting patients for tracheostomy in addition to mortality or timing alone, including in older patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10374991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103749912023-07-29 Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care Mc Mahon, A. Griffin, S. Gorman, Emma Lennon, Aoife Kielthy, Stephen Flannery, Andrea Cherian, Bindu Sam Josy, Minu Marsh, B. J Intensive Care Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilization, with a paucity of information on quality of life following tracheostomy. METHODS: Single center retrospective study including all patients requiring tracheostomy from 2017 to 2019. Information collected on demographics, severity of illness, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, discharge disposition, sedation, time to vocalization, swallow and mobilization. Outcomes were compared for early versus late tracheostomy (early = <day 10) and age category (≤ 65 vs ≥ 66 years). RESULTS: In total, 304 patients were included and 71% male, median age 59, APACHE II score 17. Median ICU and hospital LOS 16 and 56 days, respectively. ICU and hospital mortality 9.9% and 22.4%. Median time to tracheostomy 8 days, 8.55% open. Following tracheostomy, median days of sedation was 0, time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) 1 day (94% of patients achieving this), ventilator-free breathing (VFB) 5 days (72%), speaking valve 7 days (60%), dynamic sitting 5 days (64%), and swallow assessment 16 days (73%). Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS (13 vs 26 days, P < .0001), reduced sedation (6 vs 12 days, P < .0001), faster transition to level 2 care (6 vs 10 days, P < .003), NIV (1 vs 2 days, P < .003), and VFB (4 vs 7 days, P < .005). Older patients received less sedation, had higher APACHE II scores and mortality (36.1%) and 18.5% were discharged home. Median time to VFB was 6 days (63.9%), speaking valve 7 days (64.7%), swallow assessment 20.5 days (66.7%), and dynamic sitting 5 days (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Patient-centered outcomes are a worthy goal to consider when selecting patients for tracheostomy in addition to mortality or timing alone, including in older patients. SAGE Publications 2023-03-07 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10374991/ /pubmed/36883211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mc Mahon, A. Griffin, S. Gorman, Emma Lennon, Aoife Kielthy, Stephen Flannery, Andrea Cherian, Bindu Sam Josy, Minu Marsh, B. Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title | Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title_full | Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title_fullStr | Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title_short | Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care |
title_sort | patient-centred outcomes following tracheostomy in critical care |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmahona patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT griffins patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT gormanemma patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT lennonaoife patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT kielthystephen patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT flanneryandrea patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT cherianbindusam patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT josyminu patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare AT marshb patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare |