Cargando…

Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care

INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mc Mahon, A., Griffin, S., Gorman, Emma, Lennon, Aoife, Kielthy, Stephen, Flannery, Andrea, Cherian, Bindu Sam, Josy, Minu, Marsh, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669
_version_ 1785078897842323456
author Mc Mahon, A.
Griffin, S.
Gorman, Emma
Lennon, Aoife
Kielthy, Stephen
Flannery, Andrea
Cherian, Bindu Sam
Josy, Minu
Marsh, B.
author_facet Mc Mahon, A.
Griffin, S.
Gorman, Emma
Lennon, Aoife
Kielthy, Stephen
Flannery, Andrea
Cherian, Bindu Sam
Josy, Minu
Marsh, B.
author_sort Mc Mahon, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilization, with a paucity of information on quality of life following tracheostomy. METHODS: Single center retrospective study including all patients requiring tracheostomy from 2017 to 2019. Information collected on demographics, severity of illness, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, discharge disposition, sedation, time to vocalization, swallow and mobilization. Outcomes were compared for early versus late tracheostomy (early = <day 10) and age category (≤ 65 vs ≥ 66 years). RESULTS: In total, 304 patients were included and 71% male, median age 59, APACHE II score 17. Median ICU and hospital LOS 16 and 56 days, respectively. ICU and hospital mortality 9.9% and 22.4%. Median time to tracheostomy 8 days, 8.55% open. Following tracheostomy, median days of sedation was 0, time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) 1 day (94% of patients achieving this), ventilator-free breathing (VFB) 5 days (72%), speaking valve 7 days (60%), dynamic sitting 5 days (64%), and swallow assessment 16 days (73%). Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS (13 vs 26 days, P < .0001), reduced sedation (6 vs 12 days, P < .0001), faster transition to level 2 care (6 vs 10 days, P < .003), NIV (1 vs 2 days, P < .003), and VFB (4 vs 7 days, P < .005). Older patients received less sedation, had higher APACHE II scores and mortality (36.1%) and 18.5% were discharged home. Median time to VFB was 6 days (63.9%), speaking valve 7 days (64.7%), swallow assessment 20.5 days (66.7%), and dynamic sitting 5 days (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Patient-centered outcomes are a worthy goal to consider when selecting patients for tracheostomy in addition to mortality or timing alone, including in older patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10374991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103749912023-07-29 Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care Mc Mahon, A. Griffin, S. Gorman, Emma Lennon, Aoife Kielthy, Stephen Flannery, Andrea Cherian, Bindu Sam Josy, Minu Marsh, B. J Intensive Care Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilization, with a paucity of information on quality of life following tracheostomy. METHODS: Single center retrospective study including all patients requiring tracheostomy from 2017 to 2019. Information collected on demographics, severity of illness, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, discharge disposition, sedation, time to vocalization, swallow and mobilization. Outcomes were compared for early versus late tracheostomy (early = <day 10) and age category (≤ 65 vs ≥ 66 years). RESULTS: In total, 304 patients were included and 71% male, median age 59, APACHE II score 17. Median ICU and hospital LOS 16 and 56 days, respectively. ICU and hospital mortality 9.9% and 22.4%. Median time to tracheostomy 8 days, 8.55% open. Following tracheostomy, median days of sedation was 0, time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) 1 day (94% of patients achieving this), ventilator-free breathing (VFB) 5 days (72%), speaking valve 7 days (60%), dynamic sitting 5 days (64%), and swallow assessment 16 days (73%). Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS (13 vs 26 days, P < .0001), reduced sedation (6 vs 12 days, P < .0001), faster transition to level 2 care (6 vs 10 days, P < .003), NIV (1 vs 2 days, P < .003), and VFB (4 vs 7 days, P < .005). Older patients received less sedation, had higher APACHE II scores and mortality (36.1%) and 18.5% were discharged home. Median time to VFB was 6 days (63.9%), speaking valve 7 days (64.7%), swallow assessment 20.5 days (66.7%), and dynamic sitting 5 days (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Patient-centered outcomes are a worthy goal to consider when selecting patients for tracheostomy in addition to mortality or timing alone, including in older patients. SAGE Publications 2023-03-07 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10374991/ /pubmed/36883211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mc Mahon, A.
Griffin, S.
Gorman, Emma
Lennon, Aoife
Kielthy, Stephen
Flannery, Andrea
Cherian, Bindu Sam
Josy, Minu
Marsh, B.
Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title_full Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title_fullStr Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title_short Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care
title_sort patient-centred outcomes following tracheostomy in critical care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08850666231160669
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahona patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT griffins patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT gormanemma patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT lennonaoife patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT kielthystephen patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT flanneryandrea patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT cherianbindusam patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT josyminu patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare
AT marshb patientcentredoutcomesfollowingtracheostomyincriticalcare