Cargando…
Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography
X-ray imaging uses ionizing radiation to generate diagnostic images. However, unnecessary radiation exposure can pose potential risks, including an increased risk of malignancy. One factor contributing to unnecessary radiation exposure is the rejection and retaking of X-ray images, which can lead to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Carol Davila University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520472 http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0341 |
_version_ | 1785079015204192256 |
---|---|
author | Hasaneen, Mohamed AlHameli, Noora AlMinhali, Amel Alshehhi, Shamma Salih, Suliman Alomaim, Mohammad Mubarak |
author_facet | Hasaneen, Mohamed AlHameli, Noora AlMinhali, Amel Alshehhi, Shamma Salih, Suliman Alomaim, Mohammad Mubarak |
author_sort | Hasaneen, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | X-ray imaging uses ionizing radiation to generate diagnostic images. However, unnecessary radiation exposure can pose potential risks, including an increased risk of malignancy. One factor contributing to unnecessary radiation exposure is the rejection and retaking of X-ray images, which can lead to higher patient and occupational radiation doses. This study aimed to assess digital radiography rejection rates, causes of recurrence, and the most commonly repeated types of examinations. A cross-sectional online-based survey was conducted in 2022, involving 62 randomly selected radiographers in the UAE. The survey was distributed to radiographers through the head of radiology departments in various hospitals. Hospitals agreed to participate in the survey without disclosing their name. The data collected was analyzed using Excel. The study showed that 71% of radiographers working in the UAE hold a bachelor's degree. The examinations most frequently repeated were related to anatomical areas, with the spine accounting for 37.7% and facial bone for 19.7% of cases. The factors influencing repetition were primarily related to positioning (48.4%) and artifacts (21%), with the motion being the main cause of artifacts, including voluntary and involuntary movements. This study concluded that the most prevalent cause of repeating and retaking images is positioning, followed by artifacts. Furthermore, night shifts and workload impact radiographer performance, increasing the likelihood of picture retakes. The average number of rejects and repeated images has been reduced as new generations and modern equipment have been introduced, which also helped decrease the numbers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10375339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Carol Davila University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103753392023-07-29 Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography Hasaneen, Mohamed AlHameli, Noora AlMinhali, Amel Alshehhi, Shamma Salih, Suliman Alomaim, Mohammad Mubarak J Med Life Original Article X-ray imaging uses ionizing radiation to generate diagnostic images. However, unnecessary radiation exposure can pose potential risks, including an increased risk of malignancy. One factor contributing to unnecessary radiation exposure is the rejection and retaking of X-ray images, which can lead to higher patient and occupational radiation doses. This study aimed to assess digital radiography rejection rates, causes of recurrence, and the most commonly repeated types of examinations. A cross-sectional online-based survey was conducted in 2022, involving 62 randomly selected radiographers in the UAE. The survey was distributed to radiographers through the head of radiology departments in various hospitals. Hospitals agreed to participate in the survey without disclosing their name. The data collected was analyzed using Excel. The study showed that 71% of radiographers working in the UAE hold a bachelor's degree. The examinations most frequently repeated were related to anatomical areas, with the spine accounting for 37.7% and facial bone for 19.7% of cases. The factors influencing repetition were primarily related to positioning (48.4%) and artifacts (21%), with the motion being the main cause of artifacts, including voluntary and involuntary movements. This study concluded that the most prevalent cause of repeating and retaking images is positioning, followed by artifacts. Furthermore, night shifts and workload impact radiographer performance, increasing the likelihood of picture retakes. The average number of rejects and repeated images has been reduced as new generations and modern equipment have been introduced, which also helped decrease the numbers. Carol Davila University Press 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10375339/ /pubmed/37520472 http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0341 Text en ©2023 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hasaneen, Mohamed AlHameli, Noora AlMinhali, Amel Alshehhi, Shamma Salih, Suliman Alomaim, Mohammad Mubarak Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title | Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title_full | Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title_fullStr | Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title_short | Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
title_sort | assessment of image rejection in digital radiography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520472 http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasaneenmohamed assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography AT alhamelinoora assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography AT alminhaliamel assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography AT alshehhishamma assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography AT salihsuliman assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography AT alomaimmohammadmubarak assessmentofimagerejectionindigitalradiography |