Cargando…

From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds

This study endeavors to explore the transcriptomic profiles of two apple cultivars, namely, ‘Honeycrisp’ and ‘Cripps Pink,’ which represent late and early-blooming cultivars, respectively. Using RNA-sequencing technology, we analyzed floral bud samples collected at five distinct time intervals durin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapkota, Sangeeta, Salem, Mohamed, Jahed, Khalil R., Artlip, Timothy S., Sherif, Sherif M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1194244
_version_ 1785079032566513664
author Sapkota, Sangeeta
Salem, Mohamed
Jahed, Khalil R.
Artlip, Timothy S.
Sherif, Sherif M.
author_facet Sapkota, Sangeeta
Salem, Mohamed
Jahed, Khalil R.
Artlip, Timothy S.
Sherif, Sherif M.
author_sort Sapkota, Sangeeta
collection PubMed
description This study endeavors to explore the transcriptomic profiles of two apple cultivars, namely, ‘Honeycrisp’ and ‘Cripps Pink,’ which represent late and early-blooming cultivars, respectively. Using RNA-sequencing technology, we analyzed floral bud samples collected at five distinct time intervals during both endodormancy and ecodormancy. To evaluate the transcriptomic profiles of the 30 sequenced samples, we conducted principal component analysis (PCA). PC1 explained 43% of the variance, separating endodormancy and ecodormancy periods, while PC2 explained 16% of the variance, separating the two cultivars. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) increased with endodormancy progression and remained elevated during ecodormancy. The majority of DEGs were unique to a particular time point, with only a few overlapping among or between the time points. This highlights the temporal specificity of gene expression during the dormancy transition and emphasizes the importance of sampling at multiple time points to capture the complete transcriptomic dynamics of this intricate process. We identified a total of 4204 upregulated and 7817 downregulated DEGs in the comparison of endodormancy and ecodormancy, regardless of cultivar, and 2135 upregulated and 2413 downregulated DEGs in the comparison of ‘Honeycrisp’ versus ‘Cripps Pink,’ regardless of dormancy stage. Furthermore, we conducted a co-expression network analysis to gain insight into the coordinated gene expression profiles across different time points, dormancy stages, and cultivars. This analysis revealed the most significant module (ME 14), correlated with 1000 GDH and consisting of 1162 genes. The expression of the genes within this module was lower in ‘Honeycrisp’ than in ‘Cripps Pink.’ The top 20 DEGs identified in ME 14 were primarily related to jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signaling, lipid metabolism, oxidation-reduction, and transmembrane transport activity. This suggests a plausible role for these pathways in governing bud dormancy and flowering time in apple.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10375413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103754132023-07-29 From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds Sapkota, Sangeeta Salem, Mohamed Jahed, Khalil R. Artlip, Timothy S. Sherif, Sherif M. Front Plant Sci Plant Science This study endeavors to explore the transcriptomic profiles of two apple cultivars, namely, ‘Honeycrisp’ and ‘Cripps Pink,’ which represent late and early-blooming cultivars, respectively. Using RNA-sequencing technology, we analyzed floral bud samples collected at five distinct time intervals during both endodormancy and ecodormancy. To evaluate the transcriptomic profiles of the 30 sequenced samples, we conducted principal component analysis (PCA). PC1 explained 43% of the variance, separating endodormancy and ecodormancy periods, while PC2 explained 16% of the variance, separating the two cultivars. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) increased with endodormancy progression and remained elevated during ecodormancy. The majority of DEGs were unique to a particular time point, with only a few overlapping among or between the time points. This highlights the temporal specificity of gene expression during the dormancy transition and emphasizes the importance of sampling at multiple time points to capture the complete transcriptomic dynamics of this intricate process. We identified a total of 4204 upregulated and 7817 downregulated DEGs in the comparison of endodormancy and ecodormancy, regardless of cultivar, and 2135 upregulated and 2413 downregulated DEGs in the comparison of ‘Honeycrisp’ versus ‘Cripps Pink,’ regardless of dormancy stage. Furthermore, we conducted a co-expression network analysis to gain insight into the coordinated gene expression profiles across different time points, dormancy stages, and cultivars. This analysis revealed the most significant module (ME 14), correlated with 1000 GDH and consisting of 1162 genes. The expression of the genes within this module was lower in ‘Honeycrisp’ than in ‘Cripps Pink.’ The top 20 DEGs identified in ME 14 were primarily related to jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signaling, lipid metabolism, oxidation-reduction, and transmembrane transport activity. This suggests a plausible role for these pathways in governing bud dormancy and flowering time in apple. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10375413/ /pubmed/37521930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1194244 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sapkota, Salem, Jahed, Artlip and Sherif https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Sapkota, Sangeeta
Salem, Mohamed
Jahed, Khalil R.
Artlip, Timothy S.
Sherif, Sherif M.
From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title_full From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title_fullStr From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title_full_unstemmed From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title_short From endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
title_sort from endodormancy to ecodormancy: the transcriptional landscape of apple floral buds
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1194244
work_keys_str_mv AT sapkotasangeeta fromendodormancytoecodormancythetranscriptionallandscapeofapplefloralbuds
AT salemmohamed fromendodormancytoecodormancythetranscriptionallandscapeofapplefloralbuds
AT jahedkhalilr fromendodormancytoecodormancythetranscriptionallandscapeofapplefloralbuds
AT artliptimothys fromendodormancytoecodormancythetranscriptionallandscapeofapplefloralbuds
AT sherifsherifm fromendodormancytoecodormancythetranscriptionallandscapeofapplefloralbuds