Cargando…

The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With rising incidence of skin cancer and relatively increased mortality rates, an improved diagnosis of such a potentially fatal disease is of vital importance. Although frequently curable, it nevertheless places a considerable burden upon healthcare systems. Among the various types of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuo, Kuang Ming, Talley, Paul C., Chang, Chao-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02229-w
_version_ 1785079082980999168
author Kuo, Kuang Ming
Talley, Paul C.
Chang, Chao-Sheng
author_facet Kuo, Kuang Ming
Talley, Paul C.
Chang, Chao-Sheng
author_sort Kuo, Kuang Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With rising incidence of skin cancer and relatively increased mortality rates, an improved diagnosis of such a potentially fatal disease is of vital importance. Although frequently curable, it nevertheless places a considerable burden upon healthcare systems. Among the various types of skin cancers, non-melanoma skin cancer is most prevalent. Despite such prevalence and its associated cost, scant proof concerning the diagnostic accuracy via Artificial Intelligence (AI) for non-melanoma skin cancer exists. This study meta-analyzes the diagnostic test accuracy of AI used to diagnose non-melanoma forms of skin cancer, and it identifies potential covariates that account for heterogeneity between extant studies. METHODS: Various electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Dimensions) were examined to discern eligible studies beginning from March 2022. Those AI studies predictive of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies served to assess any risk of bias. RESULTS: A literature search produced 39 eligible articles for meta-analysis. The summary sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of AI for diagnosing non-melanoma skin cancer was 0.78, 0.98, & 0.97, respectively. Skin cancer typology, data sources, cross validation, ensemble models, types of techniques, pre-trained models, and image augmentation became significant covariates accounting for heterogeneity in terms of both sensitivity and/or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis results revealed that AI is predictive of non-melanoma with an acceptable performance, but sensitivity may become improved. Further, ensemble models and pre-trained models are employable to improve true positive rating. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02229-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10375663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103756632023-07-29 The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis Kuo, Kuang Ming Talley, Paul C. Chang, Chao-Sheng BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: With rising incidence of skin cancer and relatively increased mortality rates, an improved diagnosis of such a potentially fatal disease is of vital importance. Although frequently curable, it nevertheless places a considerable burden upon healthcare systems. Among the various types of skin cancers, non-melanoma skin cancer is most prevalent. Despite such prevalence and its associated cost, scant proof concerning the diagnostic accuracy via Artificial Intelligence (AI) for non-melanoma skin cancer exists. This study meta-analyzes the diagnostic test accuracy of AI used to diagnose non-melanoma forms of skin cancer, and it identifies potential covariates that account for heterogeneity between extant studies. METHODS: Various electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Dimensions) were examined to discern eligible studies beginning from March 2022. Those AI studies predictive of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies served to assess any risk of bias. RESULTS: A literature search produced 39 eligible articles for meta-analysis. The summary sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of AI for diagnosing non-melanoma skin cancer was 0.78, 0.98, & 0.97, respectively. Skin cancer typology, data sources, cross validation, ensemble models, types of techniques, pre-trained models, and image augmentation became significant covariates accounting for heterogeneity in terms of both sensitivity and/or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis results revealed that AI is predictive of non-melanoma with an acceptable performance, but sensitivity may become improved. Further, ensemble models and pre-trained models are employable to improve true positive rating. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02229-w. BioMed Central 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10375663/ /pubmed/37501114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02229-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kuo, Kuang Ming
Talley, Paul C.
Chang, Chao-Sheng
The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title_full The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title_short The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02229-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kuokuangming theaccuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis
AT talleypaulc theaccuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis
AT changchaosheng theaccuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis
AT kuokuangming accuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis
AT talleypaulc accuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis
AT changchaosheng accuracyofartificialintelligenceusedfornonmelanomaskincancerdiagnosesametaanalysis