Cargando…

Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ning, Lu, Yuning, Feng, Lei, Lin, Dongdong, Gao, Yuhai, Wu, Jiong, Wang, Ming, Wan, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110
_version_ 1785079097886507008
author Wang, Ning
Lu, Yuning
Feng, Lei
Lin, Dongdong
Gao, Yuhai
Wu, Jiong
Wang, Ming
Wan, Shu
author_facet Wang, Ning
Lu, Yuning
Feng, Lei
Lin, Dongdong
Gao, Yuhai
Wu, Jiong
Wang, Ming
Wan, Shu
author_sort Wang, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evaluate factors associated with ISR after PTAS. DATA SOURCE: We identified studies on ISR after PTAS from an electronic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Database (dated up to July 2022). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies, including 452 cases of ISR after 2,047 PTAS, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of in-stent restenosis was 22.08%. ISR was more likely to occur in patients with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.686; 95% CI: 1.242–2.288; p = 0.0008), dissection (OR = 6.293; 95% CI: 3.883–10.197; p < 0.0001), and higher residual stenosis (WMD = 3.227; 95% CI: 0.142–6.311; p = 0.0404). Patients treated with Wingspan stents had a significantly higher ISR rate than those treated with Enterprise stents (29.78% vs. 14.83%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the current estimates of the robust effects of some risk factors for in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The Enterprise stent had advantages compared with the Wingspan stent for ISR. The significant risk factors for ISR were coronary artery disease, dissection, and high residual stenosis. Local anesthesia was a suspected factor associated with ISR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10375724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103757242023-07-29 Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Ning Lu, Yuning Feng, Lei Lin, Dongdong Gao, Yuhai Wu, Jiong Wang, Ming Wan, Shu Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evaluate factors associated with ISR after PTAS. DATA SOURCE: We identified studies on ISR after PTAS from an electronic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Database (dated up to July 2022). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies, including 452 cases of ISR after 2,047 PTAS, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of in-stent restenosis was 22.08%. ISR was more likely to occur in patients with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.686; 95% CI: 1.242–2.288; p = 0.0008), dissection (OR = 6.293; 95% CI: 3.883–10.197; p < 0.0001), and higher residual stenosis (WMD = 3.227; 95% CI: 0.142–6.311; p = 0.0404). Patients treated with Wingspan stents had a significantly higher ISR rate than those treated with Enterprise stents (29.78% vs. 14.83%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the current estimates of the robust effects of some risk factors for in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The Enterprise stent had advantages compared with the Wingspan stent for ISR. The significant risk factors for ISR were coronary artery disease, dissection, and high residual stenosis. Local anesthesia was a suspected factor associated with ISR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10375724/ /pubmed/37521300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Lu, Feng, Lin, Gao, Wu, Wang and Wan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Wang, Ning
Lu, Yuning
Feng, Lei
Lin, Dongdong
Gao, Yuhai
Wu, Jiong
Wang, Ming
Wan, Shu
Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110
work_keys_str_mv AT wangning identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luyuning identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fenglei identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lindongdong identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyuhai identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujiong identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangming identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanshu identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis