Cargando…
Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110 |
_version_ | 1785079097886507008 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ning Lu, Yuning Feng, Lei Lin, Dongdong Gao, Yuhai Wu, Jiong Wang, Ming Wan, Shu |
author_facet | Wang, Ning Lu, Yuning Feng, Lei Lin, Dongdong Gao, Yuhai Wu, Jiong Wang, Ming Wan, Shu |
author_sort | Wang, Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evaluate factors associated with ISR after PTAS. DATA SOURCE: We identified studies on ISR after PTAS from an electronic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Database (dated up to July 2022). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies, including 452 cases of ISR after 2,047 PTAS, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of in-stent restenosis was 22.08%. ISR was more likely to occur in patients with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.686; 95% CI: 1.242–2.288; p = 0.0008), dissection (OR = 6.293; 95% CI: 3.883–10.197; p < 0.0001), and higher residual stenosis (WMD = 3.227; 95% CI: 0.142–6.311; p = 0.0404). Patients treated with Wingspan stents had a significantly higher ISR rate than those treated with Enterprise stents (29.78% vs. 14.83%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the current estimates of the robust effects of some risk factors for in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The Enterprise stent had advantages compared with the Wingspan stent for ISR. The significant risk factors for ISR were coronary artery disease, dissection, and high residual stenosis. Local anesthesia was a suspected factor associated with ISR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10375724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103757242023-07-29 Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Ning Lu, Yuning Feng, Lei Lin, Dongdong Gao, Yuhai Wu, Jiong Wang, Ming Wan, Shu Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evaluate factors associated with ISR after PTAS. DATA SOURCE: We identified studies on ISR after PTAS from an electronic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Database (dated up to July 2022). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies, including 452 cases of ISR after 2,047 PTAS, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of in-stent restenosis was 22.08%. ISR was more likely to occur in patients with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.686; 95% CI: 1.242–2.288; p = 0.0008), dissection (OR = 6.293; 95% CI: 3.883–10.197; p < 0.0001), and higher residual stenosis (WMD = 3.227; 95% CI: 0.142–6.311; p = 0.0404). Patients treated with Wingspan stents had a significantly higher ISR rate than those treated with Enterprise stents (29.78% vs. 14.83%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the current estimates of the robust effects of some risk factors for in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The Enterprise stent had advantages compared with the Wingspan stent for ISR. The significant risk factors for ISR were coronary artery disease, dissection, and high residual stenosis. Local anesthesia was a suspected factor associated with ISR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10375724/ /pubmed/37521300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Lu, Feng, Lin, Gao, Wu, Wang and Wan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Wang, Ning Lu, Yuning Feng, Lei Lin, Dongdong Gao, Yuhai Wu, Jiong Wang, Ming Wan, Shu Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangning identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luyuning identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fenglei identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lindongdong identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaoyuhai identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujiong identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangming identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanshu identifyingriskfactorsforinstentrestenosisinsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |