Cargando…
Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the proph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060 |
_version_ | 1785079149477494784 |
---|---|
author | Frassini, Simone Calabretto, Francesca Granieri, Stefano Fugazzola, Paola Massaro, Matteo Sargenti, Benedetta Schiavone, Luca Zanghì, Simone Dal Mas, Francesca Ansaloni, Luca Cobianchi, Lorenzo |
author_facet | Frassini, Simone Calabretto, Francesca Granieri, Stefano Fugazzola, Paola Massaro, Matteo Sargenti, Benedetta Schiavone, Luca Zanghì, Simone Dal Mas, Francesca Ansaloni, Luca Cobianchi, Lorenzo |
author_sort | Frassini, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the prophylactic mesh augmentation technique. METHODS: The Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened without time restrictions up to 21 June 2022 using the keywords ‘laparotomy closure’, ‘mesh’, ‘mesh positioning’, and ‘prophylactic mesh’, and including medical subject headings terms. Only RCTs reporting the incidence of incisional hernia and other wound complications after elective or emergency midline laparotomy, where patients were treated with prophylactic mesh augmentation or without mesh positioning, were included. The primary endpoint was to explore the risk of incisional hernia at different follow-up time points. The secondary endpoint was the risk of wound complications. The risk of bias for individual studies was assessed according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized trials. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, including 2659 patients, were retrieved. A reduction in the risk of incisional hernia at every time point was highlighted in the prophylactic mesh augmentation group (1 year, risk ratio 0.31, P = 0.0011; 2 years, risk ratio 0.44, P < 0.0001; 3 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0026; 4 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0257). An increased risk of wound complications was highlighted for patients undergoing mesh augmentation, although this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Midline laparotomy closure with prophylactic mesh augmentation can be considered safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Further trials are needed to identify the ideal type of mesh and technique for mesh positioning, but surgeons should consider prophylactic mesh augmentation to decrease incisional hernia rate, especially in high-risk patients for fascial dehiscence and even in emergency settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD42022336242 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_email.php). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10375944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103759442023-07-29 Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis Frassini, Simone Calabretto, Francesca Granieri, Stefano Fugazzola, Paola Massaro, Matteo Sargenti, Benedetta Schiavone, Luca Zanghì, Simone Dal Mas, Francesca Ansaloni, Luca Cobianchi, Lorenzo BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the prophylactic mesh augmentation technique. METHODS: The Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened without time restrictions up to 21 June 2022 using the keywords ‘laparotomy closure’, ‘mesh’, ‘mesh positioning’, and ‘prophylactic mesh’, and including medical subject headings terms. Only RCTs reporting the incidence of incisional hernia and other wound complications after elective or emergency midline laparotomy, where patients were treated with prophylactic mesh augmentation or without mesh positioning, were included. The primary endpoint was to explore the risk of incisional hernia at different follow-up time points. The secondary endpoint was the risk of wound complications. The risk of bias for individual studies was assessed according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized trials. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, including 2659 patients, were retrieved. A reduction in the risk of incisional hernia at every time point was highlighted in the prophylactic mesh augmentation group (1 year, risk ratio 0.31, P = 0.0011; 2 years, risk ratio 0.44, P < 0.0001; 3 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0026; 4 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0257). An increased risk of wound complications was highlighted for patients undergoing mesh augmentation, although this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Midline laparotomy closure with prophylactic mesh augmentation can be considered safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Further trials are needed to identify the ideal type of mesh and technique for mesh positioning, but surgeons should consider prophylactic mesh augmentation to decrease incisional hernia rate, especially in high-risk patients for fascial dehiscence and even in emergency settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD42022336242 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_email.php). Oxford University Press 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10375944/ /pubmed/37504969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Frassini, Simone Calabretto, Francesca Granieri, Stefano Fugazzola, Paola Massaro, Matteo Sargenti, Benedetta Schiavone, Luca Zanghì, Simone Dal Mas, Francesca Ansaloni, Luca Cobianchi, Lorenzo Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title | Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title_full | Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title_short | Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
title_sort | prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frassinisimone prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT calabrettofrancesca prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT granieristefano prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT fugazzolapaola prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT massaromatteo prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT sargentibenedetta prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT schiavoneluca prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT zanghisimone prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT dalmasfrancesca prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT ansaloniluca prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis AT cobianchilorenzo prophylacticmeshaugmentationafterlaparotomyforelectiveandemergencysurgerymetaanalysis |