Cargando…

Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids

We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walton-Raaby, Max, Floen, Tyler, García-Díez, Guillermo, Mora-Diez, Nelaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10376140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420
_version_ 1785079197034610688
author Walton-Raaby, Max
Floen, Tyler
García-Díez, Guillermo
Mora-Diez, Nelaine
author_facet Walton-Raaby, Max
Floen, Tyler
García-Díez, Guillermo
Mora-Diez, Nelaine
author_sort Walton-Raaby, Max
collection PubMed
description We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK(a) values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, [Formula: see text] , and the experimental aqueous pK(a) values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK(a) values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK(a) units and R(2) values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK(a) units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK(a) predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10376140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103761402023-07-29 Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids Walton-Raaby, Max Floen, Tyler García-Díez, Guillermo Mora-Diez, Nelaine Antioxidants (Basel) Article We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK(a) values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, [Formula: see text] , and the experimental aqueous pK(a) values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK(a) values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK(a) units and R(2) values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK(a) units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK(a) predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble. MDPI 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10376140/ /pubmed/37507958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Walton-Raaby, Max
Floen, Tyler
García-Díez, Guillermo
Mora-Diez, Nelaine
Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_full Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_fullStr Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_full_unstemmed Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_short Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_sort calculating the aqueous pk(a) of phenols: predictions for antioxidants and cannabinoids
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10376140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420
work_keys_str_mv AT waltonraabymax calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT floentyler calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT garciadiezguillermo calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT moradieznelaine calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids