Cargando…
Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10376140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420 |
_version_ | 1785079197034610688 |
---|---|
author | Walton-Raaby, Max Floen, Tyler García-Díez, Guillermo Mora-Diez, Nelaine |
author_facet | Walton-Raaby, Max Floen, Tyler García-Díez, Guillermo Mora-Diez, Nelaine |
author_sort | Walton-Raaby, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK(a) values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, [Formula: see text] , and the experimental aqueous pK(a) values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK(a) values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK(a) units and R(2) values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK(a) units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK(a) predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10376140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103761402023-07-29 Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids Walton-Raaby, Max Floen, Tyler García-Díez, Guillermo Mora-Diez, Nelaine Antioxidants (Basel) Article We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK(a) prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK(a) values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, [Formula: see text] , and the experimental aqueous pK(a) values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK(a) values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK(a) units and R(2) values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK(a) units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK(a) predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble. MDPI 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10376140/ /pubmed/37507958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Walton-Raaby, Max Floen, Tyler García-Díez, Guillermo Mora-Diez, Nelaine Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title | Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title_full | Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title_fullStr | Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title_full_unstemmed | Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title_short | Calculating the Aqueous pK(a) of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids |
title_sort | calculating the aqueous pk(a) of phenols: predictions for antioxidants and cannabinoids |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10376140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltonraabymax calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids AT floentyler calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids AT garciadiezguillermo calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids AT moradieznelaine calculatingtheaqueouspkaofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids |