Cargando…

Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography

Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naik, Ganesh R., Breen, Paul P., Jayarathna, Titus, Tong, Benjamin K., Eckert, Danny J., Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13070703
_version_ 1785079513840877568
author Naik, Ganesh R.
Breen, Paul P.
Jayarathna, Titus
Tong, Benjamin K.
Eckert, Danny J.
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
author_facet Naik, Ganesh R.
Breen, Paul P.
Jayarathna, Titus
Tong, Benjamin K.
Eckert, Danny J.
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
author_sort Naik, Ganesh R.
collection PubMed
description Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10377422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103774222023-07-29 Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography Naik, Ganesh R. Breen, Paul P. Jayarathna, Titus Tong, Benjamin K. Eckert, Danny J. Gargiulo, Gaetano D. Biosensors (Basel) Article Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions. MDPI 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10377422/ /pubmed/37504102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13070703 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naik, Ganesh R.
Breen, Paul P.
Jayarathna, Titus
Tong, Benjamin K.
Eckert, Danny J.
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_full Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_fullStr Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_full_unstemmed Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_short Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_sort morphic sensors for respiratory parameters estimation: validation against overnight polysomnography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13070703
work_keys_str_mv AT naikganeshr morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT breenpaulp morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT jayarathnatitus morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT tongbenjamink morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT eckertdannyj morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT gargiulogaetanod morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography