Cargando…

Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubec, Martin, Rylandsholm, Fredrik G., Rainsford, Philip, Silk, Mitchell, Bril’kov, Maxim, Kristoffersen, Tone, Juskewitz, Eric, Ericson, Johanna U., Svendsen, John Sigurd M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155
_version_ 1785079536196517888
author Jakubec, Martin
Rylandsholm, Fredrik G.
Rainsford, Philip
Silk, Mitchell
Bril’kov, Maxim
Kristoffersen, Tone
Juskewitz, Eric
Ericson, Johanna U.
Svendsen, John Sigurd M.
author_facet Jakubec, Martin
Rylandsholm, Fredrik G.
Rainsford, Philip
Silk, Mitchell
Bril’kov, Maxim
Kristoffersen, Tone
Juskewitz, Eric
Ericson, Johanna U.
Svendsen, John Sigurd M.
author_sort Jakubec, Martin
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli and AMPs is driven by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that act as kinetic barriers for the binding of AMPs to the bacterial membrane. A combination of SPR and NMR experiments provide evidence suggesting that cationic AMPs first bind to the negatively charged LPS before reaching a binding place in the lipid bilayer. In the event that the initial LPS-binding is too strong (corresponding to a low dissociation rate), the cationic AMPs cannot effectively get from the LPS to the membrane, and their antimicrobial potency will thus be diminished. On the other hand, the AMPs must also be able to effectively interact with the membrane to exert its activity. The ability of the studied cyclic hexapeptides to bind LPS and to translocate into a lipid membrane is related to the nature of the cationic charge (arginine vs. lysine) and to the distribution of hydrophobicity along the molecule (alternating vs. clumped tryptophan).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10377513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103775132023-07-29 Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli Jakubec, Martin Rylandsholm, Fredrik G. Rainsford, Philip Silk, Mitchell Bril’kov, Maxim Kristoffersen, Tone Juskewitz, Eric Ericson, Johanna U. Svendsen, John Sigurd M. Biomolecules Article Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli and AMPs is driven by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that act as kinetic barriers for the binding of AMPs to the bacterial membrane. A combination of SPR and NMR experiments provide evidence suggesting that cationic AMPs first bind to the negatively charged LPS before reaching a binding place in the lipid bilayer. In the event that the initial LPS-binding is too strong (corresponding to a low dissociation rate), the cationic AMPs cannot effectively get from the LPS to the membrane, and their antimicrobial potency will thus be diminished. On the other hand, the AMPs must also be able to effectively interact with the membrane to exert its activity. The ability of the studied cyclic hexapeptides to bind LPS and to translocate into a lipid membrane is related to the nature of the cationic charge (arginine vs. lysine) and to the distribution of hydrophobicity along the molecule (alternating vs. clumped tryptophan). MDPI 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10377513/ /pubmed/37509189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jakubec, Martin
Rylandsholm, Fredrik G.
Rainsford, Philip
Silk, Mitchell
Bril’kov, Maxim
Kristoffersen, Tone
Juskewitz, Eric
Ericson, Johanna U.
Svendsen, John Sigurd M.
Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title_full Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title_fullStr Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title_full_unstemmed Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title_short Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
title_sort goldilocks dilemma: lps works both as the initial target and a barrier for the antimicrobial action of cationic amps on e. coli
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubecmartin goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT rylandsholmfredrikg goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT rainsfordphilip goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT silkmitchell goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT brilkovmaxim goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT kristoffersentone goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT juskewitzeric goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT ericsonjohannau goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli
AT svendsenjohnsigurdm goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli