Cargando…
Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155 |
_version_ | 1785079536196517888 |
---|---|
author | Jakubec, Martin Rylandsholm, Fredrik G. Rainsford, Philip Silk, Mitchell Bril’kov, Maxim Kristoffersen, Tone Juskewitz, Eric Ericson, Johanna U. Svendsen, John Sigurd M. |
author_facet | Jakubec, Martin Rylandsholm, Fredrik G. Rainsford, Philip Silk, Mitchell Bril’kov, Maxim Kristoffersen, Tone Juskewitz, Eric Ericson, Johanna U. Svendsen, John Sigurd M. |
author_sort | Jakubec, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli and AMPs is driven by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that act as kinetic barriers for the binding of AMPs to the bacterial membrane. A combination of SPR and NMR experiments provide evidence suggesting that cationic AMPs first bind to the negatively charged LPS before reaching a binding place in the lipid bilayer. In the event that the initial LPS-binding is too strong (corresponding to a low dissociation rate), the cationic AMPs cannot effectively get from the LPS to the membrane, and their antimicrobial potency will thus be diminished. On the other hand, the AMPs must also be able to effectively interact with the membrane to exert its activity. The ability of the studied cyclic hexapeptides to bind LPS and to translocate into a lipid membrane is related to the nature of the cationic charge (arginine vs. lysine) and to the distribution of hydrophobicity along the molecule (alternating vs. clumped tryptophan). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10377513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103775132023-07-29 Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli Jakubec, Martin Rylandsholm, Fredrik G. Rainsford, Philip Silk, Mitchell Bril’kov, Maxim Kristoffersen, Tone Juskewitz, Eric Ericson, Johanna U. Svendsen, John Sigurd M. Biomolecules Article Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli and AMPs is driven by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that act as kinetic barriers for the binding of AMPs to the bacterial membrane. A combination of SPR and NMR experiments provide evidence suggesting that cationic AMPs first bind to the negatively charged LPS before reaching a binding place in the lipid bilayer. In the event that the initial LPS-binding is too strong (corresponding to a low dissociation rate), the cationic AMPs cannot effectively get from the LPS to the membrane, and their antimicrobial potency will thus be diminished. On the other hand, the AMPs must also be able to effectively interact with the membrane to exert its activity. The ability of the studied cyclic hexapeptides to bind LPS and to translocate into a lipid membrane is related to the nature of the cationic charge (arginine vs. lysine) and to the distribution of hydrophobicity along the molecule (alternating vs. clumped tryptophan). MDPI 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10377513/ /pubmed/37509189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jakubec, Martin Rylandsholm, Fredrik G. Rainsford, Philip Silk, Mitchell Bril’kov, Maxim Kristoffersen, Tone Juskewitz, Eric Ericson, Johanna U. Svendsen, John Sigurd M. Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title | Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title_full | Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title_fullStr | Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title_full_unstemmed | Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title_short | Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli |
title_sort | goldilocks dilemma: lps works both as the initial target and a barrier for the antimicrobial action of cationic amps on e. coli |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13071155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakubecmartin goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT rylandsholmfredrikg goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT rainsfordphilip goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT silkmitchell goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT brilkovmaxim goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT kristoffersentone goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT juskewitzeric goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT ericsonjohannau goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli AT svendsenjohnsigurdm goldilocksdilemmalpsworksbothastheinitialtargetandabarrierfortheantimicrobialactionofcationicampsonecoli |