The Impact of ioMRI on Glioblastoma Resection and Clinical Outcomes in a State-of-the-Art Neuro-Oncological Setup

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The relationship between the implementation of intraoperative MRI and progression-free survival of glioblastoma has been questioned in a few meta-analyses, lacking analysis of large studies based on real-world data in contemporary neurosurgery. The present study supports the evidence that the use of intraoperative MRI in modern neurosurgery severely decreases residual tumor volume and considerably helps to achieve comparable progression-free survival, even in patients with unexpected residual tumor after initial resection before intraoperative MRI. ABSTRACT: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) aims to improve gross total resection (GTR) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Despite some older randomized data on safety and feasibility, ioMRI’s actual impact in a modern neurosurgical setting utilizing a larger armamentarium of techniques has not been sufficiently investigated to date. We therefore aimed to analyze its effects on residual tumor, patient outcome, and progression-free survival (PFS) in GBM patients in a modern high-volume center. Patients undergoing ioMRI for resection of supratentorial GBM were enrolled between March 2018 and June 2020. ioMRI was performed in all cases at the end of resection when surgeons expected complete macroscopic tumor removal. Extent of resection (EOR) was performed by volumetric analysis, with GTR defined as an EOR ≥ 95%, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed through univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses. In total, we enrolled 172 patients. Mean EOR increased from 93.9% to 98.3% (p < 0.0001) due to ioMRI, equaling an increase in GTR rates from 78.5% to 93.0% (p = 0.0002). Residual tumor volume decreased from 1.3 ± 4.2 cm(3) to 0.6 ± 2.5 cm(3) (p = 0.0037). Logistic regression revealed recurrent GBM as a risk factor leading to subtotal resection (STR) (odds ratio (OR) = 3.047, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.165–7.974, p = 0.023). Additional resection after ioMRI led to equally long PFS compared to patients with complete tumor removal before ioMRI (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.898, 95%-CI 0.543–1.483, p = 0.67). ioMRI considerably reduces residual tumor volume and helps to achieve comparable PFS, even in patients with unexpected residual tumor after initial resection before ioMRI.