Development and External Validation of Partial Proportional Odds Risk Prediction Models for Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Males and Females in Canada

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Diagnosing most cancers at an earlier stage improves outcomes because treatments are more effective and often less invasive. This study looked at the health patterns of adults enrolled in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project before they were diagnosed with cancer to identify factors related to cancers that are caught early or late. These identified factors were then tested in a similar group of adults from the British Columbia Generations Project who also subsequently developed cancer, to see how well they could predict stage at diagnosis. The confirmed health patterns can be used to improve cancer prevention programs and activities to find cancer earlier in people who are at most risk of being diagnosed with late-stage cancer. ABSTRACT: Risk prediction models for cancer stage at diagnosis may identify individuals at higher risk of late-stage cancer diagnoses. Partial proportional odds risk prediction models for cancer stage at diagnosis for males and females were developed using data from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (ATP). Prediction models were validated on the British Columbia Generations Project (BCGP) cohort using discrimination and calibration measures. Among ATP males, older age at diagnosis was associated with an earlier stage at diagnosis, while full- or part-time employment, prostate-specific antigen testing, and former/current smoking were associated with a later stage at diagnosis. Among ATP females, mammogram and sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy were associated with an earlier stage at diagnosis, while older age at diagnosis, number of pregnancies, and hysterectomy were associated with a later stage at diagnosis. On external validation, discrimination results were poor for both males and females while calibration results indicated that the models did not over- or under-fit to derivation data or over- or under-predict risk. Multiple factors associated with cancer stage at diagnosis were identified among ATP participants. While the prediction model calibration was acceptable, discrimination was poor when applied to BCGP data. Updating our models with additional predictors may help improve predictive performance.