Cargando…

Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 26.1% of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harbour a KRAS mutation, which is associated with a poorer prognosis. Recent advances in targeted therapy, specifically with sotorasib and MRTX849, have shown promise in targeting KRAS mutations. This retrospective st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ruiyun, Shi, Kuangyu, Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang, Steppert, Claus, Sziklavari, Zsolt, Schmidkonz, Christian, Atzinger, Armin, Hartmann, Arndt, Vieth, Michael, Förster, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143684
_version_ 1785079600233054208
author Zhang, Ruiyun
Shi, Kuangyu
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Steppert, Claus
Sziklavari, Zsolt
Schmidkonz, Christian
Atzinger, Armin
Hartmann, Arndt
Vieth, Michael
Förster, Stefan
author_facet Zhang, Ruiyun
Shi, Kuangyu
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Steppert, Claus
Sziklavari, Zsolt
Schmidkonz, Christian
Atzinger, Armin
Hartmann, Arndt
Vieth, Michael
Förster, Stefan
author_sort Zhang, Ruiyun
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 26.1% of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harbour a KRAS mutation, which is associated with a poorer prognosis. Recent advances in targeted therapy, specifically with sotorasib and MRTX849, have shown promise in targeting KRAS mutations. This retrospective study aimed to develop a clinical prediction model that combines clinical–pathological variables and radiomics derived from PET scans to assess the KRAS mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This study utilised two different databases and randomly divided into a training, a validation, and a testing dataset to build and evaluate the predictive performance of our model. Our retrospectively developed model demonstrates good predictive accuracy for determining the KRAS mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients. ABSTRACT: Objective: Considering the essential role of KRAS mutation in NSCLC and the limited experience of PET radiomic features in KRAS mutation, a prediction model was built in our current analysis. Our model aims to evaluate the status of KRAS mutants in lung adenocarcinoma by combining PET radiomics and machine learning. Method: Patients were retrospectively selected from our database and screened from the NSCLC radiogenomic dataset from TCIA. The dataset was randomly divided into three subgroups. Two open-source software programs, 3D Slicer and Python, were used to segment lung tumours and extract radiomic features from (18)F-FDG-PET images. Feature selection was performed by the Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and RFE. Logistic regression was used to build the prediction models. AUCs from ROCs were used to compare the predictive abilities of the models. Calibration plots were obtained to examine the agreements of observed and predictive values in the validation and testing groups. DCA curves were performed to check the clinical impact of the best model. Finally, a nomogram was obtained to present the selected model. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included in our study. The whole group was divided into three datasets: a training set (n = 96), a validation set (n = 11), and a testing set (n = 12). In total, 1781 radiomic features were extracted from PET images. One hundred sixty-three predictive models were established according to each original feature group and their combinations. After model comparison and selection, one model, including wHLH_fo_IR, wHLH_glrlm_SRHGLE, wHLH_glszm_SAHGLE, and smoking habits, was validated with the highest predictive value. The model obtained AUCs of 0.731 (95% CI: 0.619~0.843), 0.750 (95% CI: 0.248~1.000), and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.448~1.000) in the training set, the validation set and the testing set, respectively. Results from calibration plots in validation and testing groups indicated that there was no departure between observed and predictive values in the two datasets (p = 0.377 and 0.861, respectively). Conclusions: Our model combining (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics and machine learning indicated a good predictive ability of KRAS status in lung adenocarcinoma. It may be a helpful non-invasive method to screen the KRAS mutation status of heterogenous lung adenocarcinoma before selected biopsy sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10377773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103777732023-07-29 Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma Zhang, Ruiyun Shi, Kuangyu Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Steppert, Claus Sziklavari, Zsolt Schmidkonz, Christian Atzinger, Armin Hartmann, Arndt Vieth, Michael Förster, Stefan Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 26.1% of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harbour a KRAS mutation, which is associated with a poorer prognosis. Recent advances in targeted therapy, specifically with sotorasib and MRTX849, have shown promise in targeting KRAS mutations. This retrospective study aimed to develop a clinical prediction model that combines clinical–pathological variables and radiomics derived from PET scans to assess the KRAS mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This study utilised two different databases and randomly divided into a training, a validation, and a testing dataset to build and evaluate the predictive performance of our model. Our retrospectively developed model demonstrates good predictive accuracy for determining the KRAS mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients. ABSTRACT: Objective: Considering the essential role of KRAS mutation in NSCLC and the limited experience of PET radiomic features in KRAS mutation, a prediction model was built in our current analysis. Our model aims to evaluate the status of KRAS mutants in lung adenocarcinoma by combining PET radiomics and machine learning. Method: Patients were retrospectively selected from our database and screened from the NSCLC radiogenomic dataset from TCIA. The dataset was randomly divided into three subgroups. Two open-source software programs, 3D Slicer and Python, were used to segment lung tumours and extract radiomic features from (18)F-FDG-PET images. Feature selection was performed by the Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and RFE. Logistic regression was used to build the prediction models. AUCs from ROCs were used to compare the predictive abilities of the models. Calibration plots were obtained to examine the agreements of observed and predictive values in the validation and testing groups. DCA curves were performed to check the clinical impact of the best model. Finally, a nomogram was obtained to present the selected model. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included in our study. The whole group was divided into three datasets: a training set (n = 96), a validation set (n = 11), and a testing set (n = 12). In total, 1781 radiomic features were extracted from PET images. One hundred sixty-three predictive models were established according to each original feature group and their combinations. After model comparison and selection, one model, including wHLH_fo_IR, wHLH_glrlm_SRHGLE, wHLH_glszm_SAHGLE, and smoking habits, was validated with the highest predictive value. The model obtained AUCs of 0.731 (95% CI: 0.619~0.843), 0.750 (95% CI: 0.248~1.000), and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.448~1.000) in the training set, the validation set and the testing set, respectively. Results from calibration plots in validation and testing groups indicated that there was no departure between observed and predictive values in the two datasets (p = 0.377 and 0.861, respectively). Conclusions: Our model combining (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics and machine learning indicated a good predictive ability of KRAS status in lung adenocarcinoma. It may be a helpful non-invasive method to screen the KRAS mutation status of heterogenous lung adenocarcinoma before selected biopsy sampling. MDPI 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10377773/ /pubmed/37509345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143684 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Ruiyun
Shi, Kuangyu
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Steppert, Claus
Sziklavari, Zsolt
Schmidkonz, Christian
Atzinger, Armin
Hartmann, Arndt
Vieth, Michael
Förster, Stefan
Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_full Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_short Ability of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma
title_sort ability of (18)f-fdg positron emission tomography radiomics and machine learning in predicting kras mutation status in therapy-naive lung adenocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143684
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangruiyun abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT shikuangyu abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT hohenforstschmidtwolfgang abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT steppertclaus abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT sziklavarizsolt abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT schmidkonzchristian abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT atzingerarmin abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT hartmannarndt abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT viethmichael abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma
AT forsterstefan abilityof18ffdgpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsandmachinelearninginpredictingkrasmutationstatusintherapynaivelungadenocarcinoma