Cargando…
Diagnostic Yield of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Histological sampling is the cornerstone of diagnosis for patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS FNB) is the most commonly used pancreatic tissue sampling technique. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic yield of a second EUS FNB a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143745 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Histological sampling is the cornerstone of diagnosis for patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS FNB) is the most commonly used pancreatic tissue sampling technique. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic yield of a second EUS FNB after a first negative one. The second puncture enabled histological diagnosis in 74% of cases, making it a very efficient procedure in this situation according to this study. In addition, morbidity was very low. The rate of benign diagnoses was 26% after a negative first puncture, which tends to suggest a second puncture rather than surgery in this situation. ABSTRACT: Patients and methods: we performed a retrospective case-control study, including cases with repeat EUS FNB for a solid pancreatic lesion, matched on a 1:2 ratio on age, sex, tumor location and presence of chronic pancreatitis with cases diagnosed on the first EUS FNB. Results: thirty-four cases and 68 controls were included in the analysis. Diagnostic accuracies were 80% and 88% in the repeat and single EUS FNB groups, respectively (p = 0.824). The second EUS FNB had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 33%. Of the 34 patients in the repeat EUS FNB group, 25 (74%) had a positive diagnosis with the second EUS FNB, 4 (12%) after surgery due to a second negative EUS FNB, 4 (12%) during clinical follow-up, and 1 (3%) after a third EUS FNB. Of the 25 patients diagnosed on the repeat EUS FNB, 17 (68%) had pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 2 (8%) neuroendocrine tumors, 2 (8%) other autoimmune pancreatitis, 2 (8%) chronic pancreatitis nodules, 1 (4%) renal cancer metastasis, and 1 (4%) other malignant diagnostic. There were no complications reported after the second EUS FNB in this study. Conclusion: repeat EUS FNB made a diagnosis in three fourths of patients with solid pancreatic lesions and a first negative EUS FNB, with 26% of benign lesions. This supports the repetition of EUS FNB sampling in this clinical situation. |
---|