Cargando…

Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study

Since class II malocclusion and lack of space within the dental arch due to early loss of deciduous molars is a common orthodontic problem in the Polish population, bone-anchored distalizers are becoming more and more popular. The aim of the present study was to evaluate palatal soft and hard tissue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibas-Stanek, Marta, Żabicki, Szczepan, Urzędowski, Michał, Pihut, Małgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421
_version_ 1785079720637890560
author Gibas-Stanek, Marta
Żabicki, Szczepan
Urzędowski, Michał
Pihut, Małgorzata
author_facet Gibas-Stanek, Marta
Żabicki, Szczepan
Urzędowski, Michał
Pihut, Małgorzata
author_sort Gibas-Stanek, Marta
collection PubMed
description Since class II malocclusion and lack of space within the dental arch due to early loss of deciduous molars is a common orthodontic problem in the Polish population, bone-anchored distalizers are becoming more and more popular. The aim of the present study was to evaluate palatal soft and hard tissue thickness using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the area of micro-implant placement of two appliances for maxillary first molar distalization: Beneslider and TopJet distalizer. The study data were 100 consecutively selected CBCT images (53 of men and 47 of women). Measurements of bone and mucosa thickness were performed at six locations in the palate and tested according to their correlation with sex and age. The biggest bone and mucosa thickness were recorded in the insertion site of the TopJet miniscrew. Bone thickness in all points of paramedian insertion was significantly greater in males and the mean difference was approximately 1–1.8 mm. Age correlates significantly (p < 0.05) and positively (r > 0) with the thickness of the mucosa at all points: the older the patient, the thicker the mucosa at each measurement point. Anatomical diversity of the hard palate in the population involves the need to perform bone and mucosa thickness measurements before palatal micro-implant placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103782562023-07-29 Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study Gibas-Stanek, Marta Żabicki, Szczepan Urzędowski, Michał Pihut, Małgorzata Diagnostics (Basel) Article Since class II malocclusion and lack of space within the dental arch due to early loss of deciduous molars is a common orthodontic problem in the Polish population, bone-anchored distalizers are becoming more and more popular. The aim of the present study was to evaluate palatal soft and hard tissue thickness using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the area of micro-implant placement of two appliances for maxillary first molar distalization: Beneslider and TopJet distalizer. The study data were 100 consecutively selected CBCT images (53 of men and 47 of women). Measurements of bone and mucosa thickness were performed at six locations in the palate and tested according to their correlation with sex and age. The biggest bone and mucosa thickness were recorded in the insertion site of the TopJet miniscrew. Bone thickness in all points of paramedian insertion was significantly greater in males and the mean difference was approximately 1–1.8 mm. Age correlates significantly (p < 0.05) and positively (r > 0) with the thickness of the mucosa at all points: the older the patient, the thicker the mucosa at each measurement point. Anatomical diversity of the hard palate in the population involves the need to perform bone and mucosa thickness measurements before palatal micro-implant placement. MDPI 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10378256/ /pubmed/37510166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gibas-Stanek, Marta
Żabicki, Szczepan
Urzędowski, Michał
Pihut, Małgorzata
Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title_full Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title_short Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study
title_sort evaluation of palatal bone thickness at the implantation areas of two popular bone-anchored distalizers—a cone beam computed tomography retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421
work_keys_str_mv AT gibasstanekmarta evaluationofpalatalbonethicknessattheimplantationareasoftwopopularboneanchoreddistalizersaconebeamcomputedtomographyretrospectivestudy
AT zabickiszczepan evaluationofpalatalbonethicknessattheimplantationareasoftwopopularboneanchoreddistalizersaconebeamcomputedtomographyretrospectivestudy
AT urzedowskimichał evaluationofpalatalbonethicknessattheimplantationareasoftwopopularboneanchoreddistalizersaconebeamcomputedtomographyretrospectivestudy
AT pihutmałgorzata evaluationofpalatalbonethicknessattheimplantationareasoftwopopularboneanchoreddistalizersaconebeamcomputedtomographyretrospectivestudy