Cargando…

Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This review focuses on the potential challenges encountered in the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). While mpMRI is accurate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, false positive and false negative results can occur. The review discusses anatomical structures and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Żurowska, Anna, Pęksa, Rafał, Bieńkowski, Michał, Skrobisz, Katarzyna, Sowa, Marek, Matuszewski, Marcin, Biernat, Wojciech, Szurowska, Edyta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143682
_version_ 1785079738463682560
author Żurowska, Anna
Pęksa, Rafał
Bieńkowski, Michał
Skrobisz, Katarzyna
Sowa, Marek
Matuszewski, Marcin
Biernat, Wojciech
Szurowska, Edyta
author_facet Żurowska, Anna
Pęksa, Rafał
Bieńkowski, Michał
Skrobisz, Katarzyna
Sowa, Marek
Matuszewski, Marcin
Biernat, Wojciech
Szurowska, Edyta
author_sort Żurowska, Anna
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This review focuses on the potential challenges encountered in the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). While mpMRI is accurate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, false positive and false negative results can occur. The review discusses anatomical structures and benign conditions that may mimic prostate cancer, including prostatitis, ectopic and stromal benign prostate hyperplasia nodules, post-biopsy hemorrhage, and abscesses. The article provides suggestions on avoiding these pitfalls and emphasizes the importance of image quality in achieving accurate interpretations. Radiologists need to be aware of these pitfalls to enhance diagnostic accuracy in the increasingly prevalent use of mpMRI for prostate evaluation. ABSTRACT: Background: Multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) is gaining wider recommendations for diagnosing and following up on prostate cancer. However, despite the high accuracy of mpMRI, false positive and false negative results are reported. Some of these may be related to normal anatomic structures, benign lesions that may mimic cancer, or poor-quality images that hamper interpretation. The aim of this review is to discuss common potential pitfalls in the interpretation of mpMRI. Methods: mpMRI of the prostates was performed on 3T MRI scanners (Philips Achieva or Siemens Magnetom Vida) according to European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines and technical requirements. Results: This pictorial review discusses normal anatomical structures such as the anterior fibromuscular stroma, periprostatic venous plexus, central zone, and benign conditions such as benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), post-biopsy hemorrhage, prostatitis, and abscess that may imitate prostate cancer, as well as the appearance of prostate cancer occurring in these locations. Furthermore, suggestions on how to avoid these pitfalls are provided, and the impact of image quality is also discussed. Conclusions: In an era of accelerating prostate mpMRI and high demand for high-quality interpretation of the scans, radiologists should be aware of these potential pitfalls to improve their diagnostic accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103783302023-07-29 Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review Żurowska, Anna Pęksa, Rafał Bieńkowski, Michał Skrobisz, Katarzyna Sowa, Marek Matuszewski, Marcin Biernat, Wojciech Szurowska, Edyta Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: This review focuses on the potential challenges encountered in the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). While mpMRI is accurate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, false positive and false negative results can occur. The review discusses anatomical structures and benign conditions that may mimic prostate cancer, including prostatitis, ectopic and stromal benign prostate hyperplasia nodules, post-biopsy hemorrhage, and abscesses. The article provides suggestions on avoiding these pitfalls and emphasizes the importance of image quality in achieving accurate interpretations. Radiologists need to be aware of these pitfalls to enhance diagnostic accuracy in the increasingly prevalent use of mpMRI for prostate evaluation. ABSTRACT: Background: Multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) is gaining wider recommendations for diagnosing and following up on prostate cancer. However, despite the high accuracy of mpMRI, false positive and false negative results are reported. Some of these may be related to normal anatomic structures, benign lesions that may mimic cancer, or poor-quality images that hamper interpretation. The aim of this review is to discuss common potential pitfalls in the interpretation of mpMRI. Methods: mpMRI of the prostates was performed on 3T MRI scanners (Philips Achieva or Siemens Magnetom Vida) according to European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines and technical requirements. Results: This pictorial review discusses normal anatomical structures such as the anterior fibromuscular stroma, periprostatic venous plexus, central zone, and benign conditions such as benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), post-biopsy hemorrhage, prostatitis, and abscess that may imitate prostate cancer, as well as the appearance of prostate cancer occurring in these locations. Furthermore, suggestions on how to avoid these pitfalls are provided, and the impact of image quality is also discussed. Conclusions: In an era of accelerating prostate mpMRI and high demand for high-quality interpretation of the scans, radiologists should be aware of these potential pitfalls to improve their diagnostic accuracy. MDPI 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10378330/ /pubmed/37509343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143682 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Żurowska, Anna
Pęksa, Rafał
Bieńkowski, Michał
Skrobisz, Katarzyna
Sowa, Marek
Matuszewski, Marcin
Biernat, Wojciech
Szurowska, Edyta
Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title_full Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title_fullStr Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title_full_unstemmed Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title_short Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics—A Pictorial Review
title_sort prostate cancer and its mimics—a pictorial review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37509343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143682
work_keys_str_mv AT zurowskaanna prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT peksarafał prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT bienkowskimichał prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT skrobiszkatarzyna prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT sowamarek prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT matuszewskimarcin prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT biernatwojciech prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview
AT szurowskaedyta prostatecanceranditsmimicsapictorialreview