Cargando…
Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version
This study investigated the psychometric nature of preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity in physical activity. It initially re-examined the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q) among Portuguese exercisers, looking at its applicability to dif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13070086 |
_version_ | 1785079748192370688 |
---|---|
author | Rodrigues, Filipe Morouço, Pedro Antunes, Raul Monteiro, Diogo Jacinto, Miguel Figueiredo, Nuno Santos, Filipe Bastos, Vasco Teixeira, Diogo |
author_facet | Rodrigues, Filipe Morouço, Pedro Antunes, Raul Monteiro, Diogo Jacinto, Miguel Figueiredo, Nuno Santos, Filipe Bastos, Vasco Teixeira, Diogo |
author_sort | Rodrigues, Filipe |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the psychometric nature of preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity in physical activity. It initially re-examined the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q) among Portuguese exercisers, looking at its applicability to different exercise activities and exercise experiences. Then, to investigate the applicability of the measure in different groups, its invariance was examined. The sample consisted of 1117 participants (528 male, 589 female) aged 18–81 years old (Mage = 36.81, SD = 11.89). All participants reported at baseline that they were exercising, on average, 3.93 days (SD = 1.36) per week. The exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) displayed the best fit. The ESEM did show invariance when tested for multigroup analysis. The conclusion of this research is that the ESEM demonstrated the best fit, displaying invariance in multigroup analysis. Furthermore, when assessing preference and tolerance in various exercise modalities, the PRETIE-Q should be primarily used as a multidimensional instrument due to the differential recognition of preference and tolerance in seemingly similar physical activity circumstances, highlighting the importance of employing context-verified measures to evaluate exercise-intensity preference and tolerance based on sample characteristics or real-time context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10378368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103783682023-07-29 Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version Rodrigues, Filipe Morouço, Pedro Antunes, Raul Monteiro, Diogo Jacinto, Miguel Figueiredo, Nuno Santos, Filipe Bastos, Vasco Teixeira, Diogo Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Article This study investigated the psychometric nature of preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity in physical activity. It initially re-examined the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q) among Portuguese exercisers, looking at its applicability to different exercise activities and exercise experiences. Then, to investigate the applicability of the measure in different groups, its invariance was examined. The sample consisted of 1117 participants (528 male, 589 female) aged 18–81 years old (Mage = 36.81, SD = 11.89). All participants reported at baseline that they were exercising, on average, 3.93 days (SD = 1.36) per week. The exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) displayed the best fit. The ESEM did show invariance when tested for multigroup analysis. The conclusion of this research is that the ESEM demonstrated the best fit, displaying invariance in multigroup analysis. Furthermore, when assessing preference and tolerance in various exercise modalities, the PRETIE-Q should be primarily used as a multidimensional instrument due to the differential recognition of preference and tolerance in seemingly similar physical activity circumstances, highlighting the importance of employing context-verified measures to evaluate exercise-intensity preference and tolerance based on sample characteristics or real-time context. MDPI 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10378368/ /pubmed/37504477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13070086 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rodrigues, Filipe Morouço, Pedro Antunes, Raul Monteiro, Diogo Jacinto, Miguel Figueiredo, Nuno Santos, Filipe Bastos, Vasco Teixeira, Diogo Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title | Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title_full | Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title_fullStr | Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title_short | Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version |
title_sort | using psychometric testing procedures for scale validity, reliability, and invariance analysis: the pretie-q portuguese version |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13070086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguesfilipe usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT moroucopedro usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT antunesraul usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT monteirodiogo usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT jacintomiguel usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT figueiredonuno usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT santosfilipe usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT bastosvasco usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion AT teixeiradiogo usingpsychometrictestingproceduresforscalevalidityreliabilityandinvarianceanalysisthepretieqportugueseversion |