Telemedicine in Care of Sarcoma Patients beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This review examines the utilization of telemedicine in sarcoma care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The findings demonstrate the potential of telemedicine to improve clinical and psychological outcomes for sarcoma patients. This development builds on the progress of tele-oncology and telerehabilitation have shown significant progress over the past decade, with the COVID-19 outbreak exerting an accelerating effect on their adoption. Telehealth applications in sarcoma care include remote consultations, psychological support and virtual symptom assessment. Both healthcare providers and patients have reported satisfaction with telehealth services, at levels comparable to in-person visits. The study concludes that telehealth offers opportunities for tailored, individualized care and is likely to play a crucial role in sarcoma patient management in the post-COVID-19 era. ABSTRACT: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a challenging environment for sarcoma patients. Most oncology societies published guidelines or recommendations prioritizing sarcoma patients and established telehealth as an efficient method of approaching them. The aim of this review is the assessment of current evidence regarding the utilization of telemedicine in diagnosis, treatment modalities, telerehabilitation and satisfaction among sarcoma patients and healthcare providers (HP). Methods: This systematic review was carried out using the databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: The application of telemedicine to the management of sarcoma has yielded improved clinical and psychological outcomes. Specifically, significant progress has been demonstrated in the areas of tele-oncology and telerehabilitation during the last decade, and the COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated this transition toward them. Telehealth has been proven efficient in a wide spectrum of applications from consultations on physical therapy and psychological support to virtual care symptom management. Both HP and patients reported satisfaction with telehealth services at levels comparable to in-person visits. Conclusions: Telehealth has already unveiled many opportunities in tailoring individualized care, and its role in the management of sarcoma patients has been established in the post-COVID-19 era, as well.