Cargando…

Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes

Osteosarcoma is a rare condition with a complex treatment. Most protocols include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and consolidation chemotherapy as the standard of treatment. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy lacks scientific evidence proving superiority in opposition to the use of iso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares do Brito, Joaquim, Santos, Rodrigo, Sarmento, Marco, Fernandes, Pedro, Portela, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070457
_version_ 1785079761292230656
author Soares do Brito, Joaquim
Santos, Rodrigo
Sarmento, Marco
Fernandes, Pedro
Portela, José
author_facet Soares do Brito, Joaquim
Santos, Rodrigo
Sarmento, Marco
Fernandes, Pedro
Portela, José
author_sort Soares do Brito, Joaquim
collection PubMed
description Osteosarcoma is a rare condition with a complex treatment. Most protocols include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and consolidation chemotherapy as the standard of treatment. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy lacks scientific evidence proving superiority in opposition to the use of isolated chemotherapy in an adjuvant regimen after surgery. We conducted a review for studies published in English between 1980 and 2020, using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus electronic databases, to evaluate the outcomes when using neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy strategies in the treatment of non-metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma, as well as the toxicity associated with different chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (ACT), depending on the chemotherapy regimen used in association with surgery. A total of 1254 articles in English were screened by title and abstract, and 146 were pre-selected for full reading and analysis. A total of 24 assays matching the inclusion criteria were selected: 10 prospective and 14 retrospective studies. This review points to an absence of significative differences in outcomes, namely overall survival, disease-free survival/event-free survival rates, or toxicity, regarding neoadjuvant or single adjuvant chemotherapy strategies used in the treatment of appendicular non-metastatic osteosarcomas. However, there is a significative difference in population dimensions between the NAC and the ACT groups. Additionally, clinical presentation, tumor localization, tumor volume, or histological type were not considered, with these variables presenting the potential to influence these results. Despite these limitations, our findings should allow a re-thinking of our current practice and promote new opportunities to optimize treatment, always looking towards better survival and lower complications rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103784182023-07-29 Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes Soares do Brito, Joaquim Santos, Rodrigo Sarmento, Marco Fernandes, Pedro Portela, José Curr Oncol Review Osteosarcoma is a rare condition with a complex treatment. Most protocols include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and consolidation chemotherapy as the standard of treatment. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy lacks scientific evidence proving superiority in opposition to the use of isolated chemotherapy in an adjuvant regimen after surgery. We conducted a review for studies published in English between 1980 and 2020, using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus electronic databases, to evaluate the outcomes when using neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy strategies in the treatment of non-metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma, as well as the toxicity associated with different chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (ACT), depending on the chemotherapy regimen used in association with surgery. A total of 1254 articles in English were screened by title and abstract, and 146 were pre-selected for full reading and analysis. A total of 24 assays matching the inclusion criteria were selected: 10 prospective and 14 retrospective studies. This review points to an absence of significative differences in outcomes, namely overall survival, disease-free survival/event-free survival rates, or toxicity, regarding neoadjuvant or single adjuvant chemotherapy strategies used in the treatment of appendicular non-metastatic osteosarcomas. However, there is a significative difference in population dimensions between the NAC and the ACT groups. Additionally, clinical presentation, tumor localization, tumor volume, or histological type were not considered, with these variables presenting the potential to influence these results. Despite these limitations, our findings should allow a re-thinking of our current practice and promote new opportunities to optimize treatment, always looking towards better survival and lower complications rates. MDPI 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10378418/ /pubmed/37504317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070457 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Soares do Brito, Joaquim
Santos, Rodrigo
Sarmento, Marco
Fernandes, Pedro
Portela, José
Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title_full Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title_fullStr Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title_short Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes
title_sort chemotherapy regimens for non-metastatic conventional appendicular osteosarcoma: a literature review based on the outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070457
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresdobritojoaquim chemotherapyregimensfornonmetastaticconventionalappendicularosteosarcomaaliteraturereviewbasedontheoutcomes
AT santosrodrigo chemotherapyregimensfornonmetastaticconventionalappendicularosteosarcomaaliteraturereviewbasedontheoutcomes
AT sarmentomarco chemotherapyregimensfornonmetastaticconventionalappendicularosteosarcomaaliteraturereviewbasedontheoutcomes
AT fernandespedro chemotherapyregimensfornonmetastaticconventionalappendicularosteosarcomaaliteraturereviewbasedontheoutcomes
AT portelajose chemotherapyregimensfornonmetastaticconventionalappendicularosteosarcomaaliteraturereviewbasedontheoutcomes