Cargando…

The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study

PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on the key areas of burden associated with existing devices and to understand the requirements for a comprehensive next-generation diagnostic device to be able to solve current challenges and provide more accurate prediction of intraocular lens (IOL) power and presbyopia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Bonnie An, Aramberri, Jaime, Vann, Robin, Abulafia, Adi, Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret, Berdahl, John, Ferko, Nicole, Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar, Goto, So, Gupta, Preeya, Multack, Samuel, Persaud, Elizabeth, Raoof, Duna, Savini, Giacomo, Shammas, H John, Wang, Li, Wang, Wendy Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521152
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S412847
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on the key areas of burden associated with existing devices and to understand the requirements for a comprehensive next-generation diagnostic device to be able to solve current challenges and provide more accurate prediction of intraocular lens (IOL) power and presbyopia correction IOL success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen expert refractive cataract surgeons including three steering committee (SC) members constituted the voting panel. Three rounds of voting included a Round 1 structured electronic questionnaire, Round 2 virtual face-to-face meeting, and Round 3 electronic questionnaire to obtain consensus on topics related to current limitations and future solutions for preoperative cataract-refractive diagnostic devices. RESULTS: Forty statements reached consensus including current limitations (n = 17) and potential solutions (n = 23) associated with preoperative diagnostic devices. Consistent with existing evidence, the panel reported unmet needs in measurement accuracy and validation, IOL power prediction, workflow, training, and surgical planning. A device that facilitates more accurate corneal measurement, effective IOL power prediction formulas for atypical eyes, simplified staff training, and improved decision-making process for surgeons regarding IOL selection is expected to help alleviate current burdens. CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi process, consensus was achieved on key unmet needs of existing preoperative diagnostic devices and requirements for a comprehensive next-generation device to provide better objective and subjective outcomes for surgeons, technicians, and patients.