Cargando…

The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study

PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on the key areas of burden associated with existing devices and to understand the requirements for a comprehensive next-generation diagnostic device to be able to solve current challenges and provide more accurate prediction of intraocular lens (IOL) power and presbyopia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Bonnie An, Aramberri, Jaime, Vann, Robin, Abulafia, Adi, Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret, Berdahl, John, Ferko, Nicole, Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar, Goto, So, Gupta, Preeya, Multack, Samuel, Persaud, Elizabeth, Raoof, Duna, Savini, Giacomo, Shammas, H John, Wang, Li, Wang, Wendy Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521152
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S412847
_version_ 1785079810011168768
author Henderson, Bonnie An
Aramberri, Jaime
Vann, Robin
Abulafia, Adi
Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret
Berdahl, John
Ferko, Nicole
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Goto, So
Gupta, Preeya
Multack, Samuel
Persaud, Elizabeth
Raoof, Duna
Savini, Giacomo
Shammas, H John
Wang, Li
Wang, Wendy Zhi
author_facet Henderson, Bonnie An
Aramberri, Jaime
Vann, Robin
Abulafia, Adi
Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret
Berdahl, John
Ferko, Nicole
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Goto, So
Gupta, Preeya
Multack, Samuel
Persaud, Elizabeth
Raoof, Duna
Savini, Giacomo
Shammas, H John
Wang, Li
Wang, Wendy Zhi
author_sort Henderson, Bonnie An
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on the key areas of burden associated with existing devices and to understand the requirements for a comprehensive next-generation diagnostic device to be able to solve current challenges and provide more accurate prediction of intraocular lens (IOL) power and presbyopia correction IOL success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen expert refractive cataract surgeons including three steering committee (SC) members constituted the voting panel. Three rounds of voting included a Round 1 structured electronic questionnaire, Round 2 virtual face-to-face meeting, and Round 3 electronic questionnaire to obtain consensus on topics related to current limitations and future solutions for preoperative cataract-refractive diagnostic devices. RESULTS: Forty statements reached consensus including current limitations (n = 17) and potential solutions (n = 23) associated with preoperative diagnostic devices. Consistent with existing evidence, the panel reported unmet needs in measurement accuracy and validation, IOL power prediction, workflow, training, and surgical planning. A device that facilitates more accurate corneal measurement, effective IOL power prediction formulas for atypical eyes, simplified staff training, and improved decision-making process for surgeons regarding IOL selection is expected to help alleviate current burdens. CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi process, consensus was achieved on key unmet needs of existing preoperative diagnostic devices and requirements for a comprehensive next-generation device to provide better objective and subjective outcomes for surgeons, technicians, and patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103786072023-07-29 The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study Henderson, Bonnie An Aramberri, Jaime Vann, Robin Abulafia, Adi Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret Berdahl, John Ferko, Nicole Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar Goto, So Gupta, Preeya Multack, Samuel Persaud, Elizabeth Raoof, Duna Savini, Giacomo Shammas, H John Wang, Li Wang, Wendy Zhi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on the key areas of burden associated with existing devices and to understand the requirements for a comprehensive next-generation diagnostic device to be able to solve current challenges and provide more accurate prediction of intraocular lens (IOL) power and presbyopia correction IOL success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen expert refractive cataract surgeons including three steering committee (SC) members constituted the voting panel. Three rounds of voting included a Round 1 structured electronic questionnaire, Round 2 virtual face-to-face meeting, and Round 3 electronic questionnaire to obtain consensus on topics related to current limitations and future solutions for preoperative cataract-refractive diagnostic devices. RESULTS: Forty statements reached consensus including current limitations (n = 17) and potential solutions (n = 23) associated with preoperative diagnostic devices. Consistent with existing evidence, the panel reported unmet needs in measurement accuracy and validation, IOL power prediction, workflow, training, and surgical planning. A device that facilitates more accurate corneal measurement, effective IOL power prediction formulas for atypical eyes, simplified staff training, and improved decision-making process for surgeons regarding IOL selection is expected to help alleviate current burdens. CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi process, consensus was achieved on key unmet needs of existing preoperative diagnostic devices and requirements for a comprehensive next-generation device to provide better objective and subjective outcomes for surgeons, technicians, and patients. Dove 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10378607/ /pubmed/37521152 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S412847 Text en © 2023 Henderson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Henderson, Bonnie An
Aramberri, Jaime
Vann, Robin
Abulafia, Adi
Ainslie-Garcia, Margaret
Berdahl, John
Ferko, Nicole
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Goto, So
Gupta, Preeya
Multack, Samuel
Persaud, Elizabeth
Raoof, Duna
Savini, Giacomo
Shammas, H John
Wang, Li
Wang, Wendy Zhi
The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title_full The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title_fullStr The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title_short The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study
title_sort current burden and future solutions for preoperative cataract-refractive evaluation diagnostic devices: a modified delphi study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521152
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S412847
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonbonniean thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT aramberrijaime thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT vannrobin thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT abulafiaadi thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT ainsliegarciamargaret thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT berdahljohn thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT ferkonicole thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT gundersenkjellgunnar thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT gotoso thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT guptapreeya thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT multacksamuel thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT persaudelizabeth thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT raoofduna thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT savinigiacomo thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT shammashjohn thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT wangli thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT wangwendyzhi thecurrentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT hendersonbonniean currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT aramberrijaime currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT vannrobin currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT abulafiaadi currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT ainsliegarciamargaret currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT berdahljohn currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT ferkonicole currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT gundersenkjellgunnar currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT gotoso currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT guptapreeya currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT multacksamuel currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT persaudelizabeth currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT raoofduna currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT savinigiacomo currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT shammashjohn currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT wangli currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy
AT wangwendyzhi currentburdenandfuturesolutionsforpreoperativecataractrefractiveevaluationdiagnosticdevicesamodifieddelphistudy