Cargando…
Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review
The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) is rising rapidly. However, it should be carried out only under valid obstetric indications due to the various complications associated with it. Therefore, to record CS incidences, Robson’s Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) was implemented. This review f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41091 |
_version_ | 1785079836628221952 |
---|---|
author | Jiandani, Farah Somalwar, Savita Bhalerao, Anuja |
author_facet | Jiandani, Farah Somalwar, Savita Bhalerao, Anuja |
author_sort | Jiandani, Farah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) is rising rapidly. However, it should be carried out only under valid obstetric indications due to the various complications associated with it. Therefore, to record CS incidences, Robson’s Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) was implemented. This review focuses on the prevalence of CS rates found in various studies and identifies the clinically important groups that were most involved in CS deliveries. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed in this review. "Caesarean delivery" OR "Robson's Ten Group" OR "Classification System" were keywords used to search literature. Twenty-one studies were included in this review based on eligibility criteria. We concluded that group 5 was the major contributing factor for the increase in CS rates followed by group 10, group 4, group 2, and group 1. Previous CS was the most common factor responsible for increasing CS rates. We emphasize that Robson's TGCS is an essential parameter for recording CS rates and is simple to use for CS rate comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10378715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103787152023-07-29 Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review Jiandani, Farah Somalwar, Savita Bhalerao, Anuja Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) is rising rapidly. However, it should be carried out only under valid obstetric indications due to the various complications associated with it. Therefore, to record CS incidences, Robson’s Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) was implemented. This review focuses on the prevalence of CS rates found in various studies and identifies the clinically important groups that were most involved in CS deliveries. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed in this review. "Caesarean delivery" OR "Robson's Ten Group" OR "Classification System" were keywords used to search literature. Twenty-one studies were included in this review based on eligibility criteria. We concluded that group 5 was the major contributing factor for the increase in CS rates followed by group 10, group 4, group 2, and group 1. Previous CS was the most common factor responsible for increasing CS rates. We emphasize that Robson's TGCS is an essential parameter for recording CS rates and is simple to use for CS rate comparison. Cureus 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10378715/ /pubmed/37519485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41091 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jiandani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics/Gynecology Jiandani, Farah Somalwar, Savita Bhalerao, Anuja Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title | Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson’s Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | frequency of caesarean section classified by robson’s ten group classification system: a scoping review |
topic | Obstetrics/Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiandanifarah frequencyofcaesareansectionclassifiedbyrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemascopingreview AT somalwarsavita frequencyofcaesareansectionclassifiedbyrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemascopingreview AT bhaleraoanuja frequencyofcaesareansectionclassifiedbyrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemascopingreview |