Cargando…

3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts

Cells are influenced by several biomechanical aspects of their microenvironment, such as substrate geometry. According to the literature, substrate geometry influences the behavior of muscle cells; in particular, the curvature feature improves cell proliferation. However, the effect of substrate geo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loi, Giada, Scocozza, Franca, Aliberti, Flaminia, Rinvenuto, Lorenza, Cidonio, Gianluca, Marchesi, Nicola, Benedetti, Laura, Ceccarelli, Gabriele, Conti, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9070595
_version_ 1785079849775267840
author Loi, Giada
Scocozza, Franca
Aliberti, Flaminia
Rinvenuto, Lorenza
Cidonio, Gianluca
Marchesi, Nicola
Benedetti, Laura
Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Conti, Michele
author_facet Loi, Giada
Scocozza, Franca
Aliberti, Flaminia
Rinvenuto, Lorenza
Cidonio, Gianluca
Marchesi, Nicola
Benedetti, Laura
Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Conti, Michele
author_sort Loi, Giada
collection PubMed
description Cells are influenced by several biomechanical aspects of their microenvironment, such as substrate geometry. According to the literature, substrate geometry influences the behavior of muscle cells; in particular, the curvature feature improves cell proliferation. However, the effect of substrate geometry on the myogenic differentiation process is not clear and needs to be further investigated. Here, we show that the 3D co-printing technique allows the realization of substrates. To test the influence of the co-printing technique on cellular behavior, we realized linear polycaprolactone substrates with channels in which a fibrinogen-based hydrogel loaded with C2C12 cells was deposited. Cell viability and differentiation were investigated up to 21 days in culture. The results suggest that this technology significantly improves the differentiation at 14 days. Therefore, we investigate the substrate geometry influence by comparing three different co-printed geometries—linear, circular, and hybrid structures (linear and circular features combined). Based on our results, all structures exhibit optimal cell viability (>94%), but the linear pattern allows to increase the in vitro cell differentiation, in particular after 14 days of culture. This study proposes an endorsed approach for creating artificial muscles for future skeletal muscle tissue engineering applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103787712023-07-29 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts Loi, Giada Scocozza, Franca Aliberti, Flaminia Rinvenuto, Lorenza Cidonio, Gianluca Marchesi, Nicola Benedetti, Laura Ceccarelli, Gabriele Conti, Michele Gels Article Cells are influenced by several biomechanical aspects of their microenvironment, such as substrate geometry. According to the literature, substrate geometry influences the behavior of muscle cells; in particular, the curvature feature improves cell proliferation. However, the effect of substrate geometry on the myogenic differentiation process is not clear and needs to be further investigated. Here, we show that the 3D co-printing technique allows the realization of substrates. To test the influence of the co-printing technique on cellular behavior, we realized linear polycaprolactone substrates with channels in which a fibrinogen-based hydrogel loaded with C2C12 cells was deposited. Cell viability and differentiation were investigated up to 21 days in culture. The results suggest that this technology significantly improves the differentiation at 14 days. Therefore, we investigate the substrate geometry influence by comparing three different co-printed geometries—linear, circular, and hybrid structures (linear and circular features combined). Based on our results, all structures exhibit optimal cell viability (>94%), but the linear pattern allows to increase the in vitro cell differentiation, in particular after 14 days of culture. This study proposes an endorsed approach for creating artificial muscles for future skeletal muscle tissue engineering applications. MDPI 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10378771/ /pubmed/37504474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9070595 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Loi, Giada
Scocozza, Franca
Aliberti, Flaminia
Rinvenuto, Lorenza
Cidonio, Gianluca
Marchesi, Nicola
Benedetti, Laura
Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Conti, Michele
3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title_full 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title_fullStr 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title_full_unstemmed 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title_short 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts
title_sort 3d co-printing and substrate geometry influence the differentiation of c2c12 skeletal myoblasts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9070595
work_keys_str_mv AT loigiada 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT scocozzafranca 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT alibertiflaminia 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT rinvenutolorenza 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT cidoniogianluca 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT marchesinicola 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT benedettilaura 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT ceccarelligabriele 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts
AT contimichele 3dcoprintingandsubstrategeometryinfluencethedifferentiationofc2c12skeletalmyoblasts