Cargando…

Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases

In the process of developing and implementing innovative implant technologies the consideration of patient preferences can be beneficial for patients, doctors and developers. Nevertheless, in existing literature, there is still scarce knowledge of patients’ perspectives on long-term implant care. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Sabine, Harzheim, Laura, Hübner, Constanze, Lorke, Mariya, Jünger, Saskia, Buchholz, Annika, Frech, Stefanie, Steffens, Melanie, Woopen, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146358
_version_ 1785079855691333632
author Schulz, Sabine
Harzheim, Laura
Hübner, Constanze
Lorke, Mariya
Jünger, Saskia
Buchholz, Annika
Frech, Stefanie
Steffens, Melanie
Woopen, Christiane
author_facet Schulz, Sabine
Harzheim, Laura
Hübner, Constanze
Lorke, Mariya
Jünger, Saskia
Buchholz, Annika
Frech, Stefanie
Steffens, Melanie
Woopen, Christiane
author_sort Schulz, Sabine
collection PubMed
description In the process of developing and implementing innovative implant technologies the consideration of patient preferences can be beneficial for patients, doctors and developers. Nevertheless, in existing literature, there is still scarce knowledge of patients’ perspectives on long-term implant care. In this study, three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were conducted in the context of cochlear implants (CI, n = 92), glaucoma implants (GI, n = 21) and cardiovascular implants (CVI, n = 23), examining the relative importance of attributes of long-term implant care from the patients’ perspective. The participants chose between differently shaped options for implant-related care. The attributes of these care options were generated and selected based on previous literature reviews, group discussions and a diary study with patients. The choice data were analyzed via binary logit regression. In CI-DCE, the technological compatibility of the implant with newer implant models, accessories or devices from other manufacturers was highly valued by participants, whereas in GI-DCE the (in)dependency on glaucoma medication post-implantation had the greatest influence on participants’ choice behavior. In CVI-DCE, the attribute with the highest relative importance related to the means of securing long-term treatment success. In all three DCE, shared decision making was relatively important for participants. Our results emphasized the importance of an adequate transfer of technological advancements in implant care for promoting patient benefits, such as the availability of comprehensible, understandable, high-quality information about current developments. Similarly, promoting technological health literacy and further pushing the technological compatibility, durability and safety of implants are directions for future implant development in accordance with patients’ preferences. Therefore, the participation of implant wearers in the development process is encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10378795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103787952023-07-29 Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases Schulz, Sabine Harzheim, Laura Hübner, Constanze Lorke, Mariya Jünger, Saskia Buchholz, Annika Frech, Stefanie Steffens, Melanie Woopen, Christiane Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In the process of developing and implementing innovative implant technologies the consideration of patient preferences can be beneficial for patients, doctors and developers. Nevertheless, in existing literature, there is still scarce knowledge of patients’ perspectives on long-term implant care. In this study, three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were conducted in the context of cochlear implants (CI, n = 92), glaucoma implants (GI, n = 21) and cardiovascular implants (CVI, n = 23), examining the relative importance of attributes of long-term implant care from the patients’ perspective. The participants chose between differently shaped options for implant-related care. The attributes of these care options were generated and selected based on previous literature reviews, group discussions and a diary study with patients. The choice data were analyzed via binary logit regression. In CI-DCE, the technological compatibility of the implant with newer implant models, accessories or devices from other manufacturers was highly valued by participants, whereas in GI-DCE the (in)dependency on glaucoma medication post-implantation had the greatest influence on participants’ choice behavior. In CVI-DCE, the attribute with the highest relative importance related to the means of securing long-term treatment success. In all three DCE, shared decision making was relatively important for participants. Our results emphasized the importance of an adequate transfer of technological advancements in implant care for promoting patient benefits, such as the availability of comprehensible, understandable, high-quality information about current developments. Similarly, promoting technological health literacy and further pushing the technological compatibility, durability and safety of implants are directions for future implant development in accordance with patients’ preferences. Therefore, the participation of implant wearers in the development process is encouraged. MDPI 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10378795/ /pubmed/37510590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146358 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schulz, Sabine
Harzheim, Laura
Hübner, Constanze
Lorke, Mariya
Jünger, Saskia
Buchholz, Annika
Frech, Stefanie
Steffens, Melanie
Woopen, Christiane
Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title_full Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title_fullStr Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title_short Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases
title_sort patient preferences for long-term implant care in cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular diseases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146358
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzsabine patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT harzheimlaura patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT hubnerconstanze patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT lorkemariya patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT jungersaskia patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT buchholzannika patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT frechstefanie patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT steffensmelanie patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases
AT woopenchristiane patientpreferencesforlongtermimplantcareincochlearglaucomaandcardiovasculardiseases