Cargando…
An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention
The impact that occurs on the runner’s foot when it lands on the ground depends on numerous factors: footwear, running technique, foot strike and landing pattern, among others. However, the surface is a decisive factor that can be selected by the runner to improve their sports practice, thereby avoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146405 |
_version_ | 1785079875407708160 |
---|---|
author | Ferro-Sánchez, Amelia Martín-Castellanos, Adrián de la Rubia, Alfonso García-Aliaga, Abraham Hontoria-Galán, Mónica Marquina, Moisés |
author_facet | Ferro-Sánchez, Amelia Martín-Castellanos, Adrián de la Rubia, Alfonso García-Aliaga, Abraham Hontoria-Galán, Mónica Marquina, Moisés |
author_sort | Ferro-Sánchez, Amelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact that occurs on the runner’s foot when it lands on the ground depends on numerous factors: footwear, running technique, foot strike and landing pattern, among others. However, the surface is a decisive factor that can be selected by the runner to improve their sports practice, thereby avoiding injuries. This study aimed to assess the number and magnitude of accelerations in impact (produced by the runner when their foot strikes the ground) on three different surfaces (grass, synthetic track, and concrete) in order to know how to prevent injuries. Thirty amateur runners (age 22.6 ± 2.43 years) participated in the study. They had to run consecutively on three different surfaces at the same speed, with a three axis-accelerometer placed on the sacrum and wearing their own shoes. The results showed that the running impacts differed based on the type of surface. Higher mean acceleration (MA) and mean peak acceleration (PA) in the impacts were observed on concrete compared to the other two surfaces. There were small differences for MA: 1.35 ± 0.1 g (concrete) vs. 1.30 ± 0.1 g (synthetic track) SD: 0.43 (0.33, 0.54) and 1.30 ± 0.1 g (grass) SD: 0.36 (0.25, 0.46), and small differences for PA: 3.90 ± 0.55 g (concrete) vs. 3.68 ± 0.45 g (synthetic track) SD 0.42 (0.21, 0.64) and 3.76 ± 0.48 g (grass) SD 0.27 (0.05, 0.48), implying that greater impacts were produced on concrete compared to synthetic track and grass. The number of peaks of 4 to 5 g of total acceleration was greater for concrete, showing small differences from synthetic track: SD 0.23 (−0.45, 0.9). Additionally, the number of steps was higher on synthetic track (34.90 ± 2.67), and small differences were shown compared with concrete (33.37 ± 2.95) SD 0.30 (−0.25, 0.85) and with grass (35.60 ± 3.94) SD 0.36 (−0.19, 0.91). These results may indicate a change in technique based on the terrain. Given the increasing popularity of running, participants must be trained to withstand the accelerations in impact that occur on different surfaces in order to prevent injuries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10378879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103788792023-07-29 An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention Ferro-Sánchez, Amelia Martín-Castellanos, Adrián de la Rubia, Alfonso García-Aliaga, Abraham Hontoria-Galán, Mónica Marquina, Moisés Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The impact that occurs on the runner’s foot when it lands on the ground depends on numerous factors: footwear, running technique, foot strike and landing pattern, among others. However, the surface is a decisive factor that can be selected by the runner to improve their sports practice, thereby avoiding injuries. This study aimed to assess the number and magnitude of accelerations in impact (produced by the runner when their foot strikes the ground) on three different surfaces (grass, synthetic track, and concrete) in order to know how to prevent injuries. Thirty amateur runners (age 22.6 ± 2.43 years) participated in the study. They had to run consecutively on three different surfaces at the same speed, with a three axis-accelerometer placed on the sacrum and wearing their own shoes. The results showed that the running impacts differed based on the type of surface. Higher mean acceleration (MA) and mean peak acceleration (PA) in the impacts were observed on concrete compared to the other two surfaces. There were small differences for MA: 1.35 ± 0.1 g (concrete) vs. 1.30 ± 0.1 g (synthetic track) SD: 0.43 (0.33, 0.54) and 1.30 ± 0.1 g (grass) SD: 0.36 (0.25, 0.46), and small differences for PA: 3.90 ± 0.55 g (concrete) vs. 3.68 ± 0.45 g (synthetic track) SD 0.42 (0.21, 0.64) and 3.76 ± 0.48 g (grass) SD 0.27 (0.05, 0.48), implying that greater impacts were produced on concrete compared to synthetic track and grass. The number of peaks of 4 to 5 g of total acceleration was greater for concrete, showing small differences from synthetic track: SD 0.23 (−0.45, 0.9). Additionally, the number of steps was higher on synthetic track (34.90 ± 2.67), and small differences were shown compared with concrete (33.37 ± 2.95) SD 0.30 (−0.25, 0.85) and with grass (35.60 ± 3.94) SD 0.36 (−0.19, 0.91). These results may indicate a change in technique based on the terrain. Given the increasing popularity of running, participants must be trained to withstand the accelerations in impact that occur on different surfaces in order to prevent injuries. MDPI 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10378879/ /pubmed/37510637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146405 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ferro-Sánchez, Amelia Martín-Castellanos, Adrián de la Rubia, Alfonso García-Aliaga, Abraham Hontoria-Galán, Mónica Marquina, Moisés An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title | An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title_full | An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title_fullStr | An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title_short | An Analysis of Running Impact on Different Surfaces for Injury Prevention |
title_sort | analysis of running impact on different surfaces for injury prevention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrosanchezamelia ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT martincastellanosadrian ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT delarubiaalfonso ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT garciaaliagaabraham ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT hontoriagalanmonica ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT marquinamoises ananalysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT ferrosanchezamelia analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT martincastellanosadrian analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT delarubiaalfonso analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT garciaaliagaabraham analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT hontoriagalanmonica analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention AT marquinamoises analysisofrunningimpactondifferentsurfacesforinjuryprevention |