Comparison of remimazolam and propofol induction on hemodynamic response in hypertensive patients

Hemodynamic variations during the induction of general anesthesia are more profound in hypertensive patients, and the risk of hypoperfusion-induced organ damage followed by hypotensive episodes is higher in hypertensive patients than in normotensive patients. Thus, we compared the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the remimazolam (Group R, n = 48) and propofol (Group P, n = 48) groups: remimazolam was continued at 6 mg/kg/hour until the patient lost consciousness, followed by 1 mg/kg/hour until 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Propofol was administered as a slow bolus of 1.5 to 2 mg/kg, followed by 3 to 6 mg/kg/hour 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Hemodynamic parameters including mean blood pressure (MBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, and incidence of hypotension were analyzed during the induction period, pre-induction (T1), immediately after loss of consciousness (T2), at 1 and 3 minutes after neuromuscular blockade (T3, T4), immediately after tracheal intubation (T5), and at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation (T6, T7, T8). RESULTS: The MBP, SBP, and DBP were significantly lower in the propofol group than in the remimazolam group (MBP: at T2, T3, T4, and T5; SBP: at T2, T3, and T4; DBP: at T5). HR was significantly lower in the propofol group at T3, T4, and T8. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in the propofol group than that in the remimazolam group. The incidence of bradycardia was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam induction was more stable than propofol induction in preserving normal hemodynamics and was associated with a relatively lower incidence of hypotension. Remimazolam may be preferable to propofol for induction of anesthesia in patients with hypertension.