Cargando…

Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide

During doctor’s visits, fundamental decisions regarding a patient’s diagnosis and therapy are taken. However, consultations often take place within a limited time frame and are characterized by an asymmetric interaction. Therefore, patients’ questions can remain unanswered and concerns unspoken. A &...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaks, Rebecca, Guggiari, Elena, De Gani, Saskia Maria, Nicca, Dunja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146414
_version_ 1785079978314956800
author Jaks, Rebecca
Guggiari, Elena
De Gani, Saskia Maria
Nicca, Dunja
author_facet Jaks, Rebecca
Guggiari, Elena
De Gani, Saskia Maria
Nicca, Dunja
author_sort Jaks, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description During doctor’s visits, fundamental decisions regarding a patient’s diagnosis and therapy are taken. However, consultations often take place within a limited time frame and are characterized by an asymmetric interaction. Therefore, patients’ questions can remain unanswered and concerns unspoken. A "Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit" (DocVISITguide) was developed to prepare patients for their visits, supporting them to take an active role in the communication and leave the consultation well-informed. This paper describes the development of the DocVISITguide and its first small-scale evaluation based on a sequential explanatory mixed methods design from the patients’ perspective. For this purpose, a small sample of patients completed a pre- and post-questionnaire, and two in-depth interviews were conducted. Most participants found the DocVISITguide easy to understand. The guide helped them to take a closer look at their own health situation and be better prepared for the visit. More than three-quarters (82%) of the participants would probably use the guide again, and all (100%) would recommend it to family and friends. However, some patients felt unsure about using the guide within the consultation and showing it to their physician. To counteract this uncertainty, physicians should be actively involved in the use of such guides in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10379287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103792872023-07-29 Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide Jaks, Rebecca Guggiari, Elena De Gani, Saskia Maria Nicca, Dunja Int J Environ Res Public Health Article During doctor’s visits, fundamental decisions regarding a patient’s diagnosis and therapy are taken. However, consultations often take place within a limited time frame and are characterized by an asymmetric interaction. Therefore, patients’ questions can remain unanswered and concerns unspoken. A "Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit" (DocVISITguide) was developed to prepare patients for their visits, supporting them to take an active role in the communication and leave the consultation well-informed. This paper describes the development of the DocVISITguide and its first small-scale evaluation based on a sequential explanatory mixed methods design from the patients’ perspective. For this purpose, a small sample of patients completed a pre- and post-questionnaire, and two in-depth interviews were conducted. Most participants found the DocVISITguide easy to understand. The guide helped them to take a closer look at their own health situation and be better prepared for the visit. More than three-quarters (82%) of the participants would probably use the guide again, and all (100%) would recommend it to family and friends. However, some patients felt unsure about using the guide within the consultation and showing it to their physician. To counteract this uncertainty, physicians should be actively involved in the use of such guides in the future. MDPI 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10379287/ /pubmed/37510646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146414 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jaks, Rebecca
Guggiari, Elena
De Gani, Saskia Maria
Nicca, Dunja
Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title_full Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title_fullStr Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title_short Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide
title_sort patients’ perspectives on the use of a newly developed “patients’ guide for doctor’s visit”: docvisitguide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146414
work_keys_str_mv AT jaksrebecca patientsperspectivesontheuseofanewlydevelopedpatientsguidefordoctorsvisitdocvisitguide
AT guggiarielena patientsperspectivesontheuseofanewlydevelopedpatientsguidefordoctorsvisitdocvisitguide
AT deganisaskiamaria patientsperspectivesontheuseofanewlydevelopedpatientsguidefordoctorsvisitdocvisitguide
AT niccadunja patientsperspectivesontheuseofanewlydevelopedpatientsguidefordoctorsvisitdocvisitguide