Cargando…

Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review

Rigorous and effective evaluations inform policy and service delivery and create evidence of program impacts and outcomes for the communities they are designed to support. Genuine engagement of communities is a key feature of effective evaluation, building trust and enhancing relevancy for communiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vine, Kristina, Benveniste, Tessa, Ramanathan, Shanthi, Longman, Jo, Williams, Megan, Laycock, Alison, Matthews, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510669
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146437
_version_ 1785080058428260352
author Vine, Kristina
Benveniste, Tessa
Ramanathan, Shanthi
Longman, Jo
Williams, Megan
Laycock, Alison
Matthews, Veronica
author_facet Vine, Kristina
Benveniste, Tessa
Ramanathan, Shanthi
Longman, Jo
Williams, Megan
Laycock, Alison
Matthews, Veronica
author_sort Vine, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Rigorous and effective evaluations inform policy and service delivery and create evidence of program impacts and outcomes for the communities they are designed to support. Genuine engagement of communities is a key feature of effective evaluation, building trust and enhancing relevancy for communities and providing meaningful outcomes and culturally relevant findings. This applies to Indigenous peoples’ leadership and perspectives when undertaking evaluations on programs that involve Indigenous communities. This systematic scoping review sought to explore the characteristics of culturally informed evaluations and the extent of their application in Australia, including the use of specific evaluation tools and types of community engagement. Academic and grey literature were searched between 2003 and 2023, with 57 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Over time, there was an increase in the number of culturally informed evaluations undertaken, predominantly in the health and wellbeing sector. Around a quarter used a tool specifically developed for Indigenous evaluations. Half of the publications included Indigenous authorship; however, most studies lacked detail on how evaluations engaged with communities. This review highlights the need for further development of evaluation tools and standardised reporting to allow for shared learnings and improvement in culturally safe evaluation practices for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10379730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103797302023-07-29 Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review Vine, Kristina Benveniste, Tessa Ramanathan, Shanthi Longman, Jo Williams, Megan Laycock, Alison Matthews, Veronica Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Rigorous and effective evaluations inform policy and service delivery and create evidence of program impacts and outcomes for the communities they are designed to support. Genuine engagement of communities is a key feature of effective evaluation, building trust and enhancing relevancy for communities and providing meaningful outcomes and culturally relevant findings. This applies to Indigenous peoples’ leadership and perspectives when undertaking evaluations on programs that involve Indigenous communities. This systematic scoping review sought to explore the characteristics of culturally informed evaluations and the extent of their application in Australia, including the use of specific evaluation tools and types of community engagement. Academic and grey literature were searched between 2003 and 2023, with 57 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Over time, there was an increase in the number of culturally informed evaluations undertaken, predominantly in the health and wellbeing sector. Around a quarter used a tool specifically developed for Indigenous evaluations. Half of the publications included Indigenous authorship; however, most studies lacked detail on how evaluations engaged with communities. This review highlights the need for further development of evaluation tools and standardised reporting to allow for shared learnings and improvement in culturally safe evaluation practices for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. MDPI 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10379730/ /pubmed/37510669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146437 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vine, Kristina
Benveniste, Tessa
Ramanathan, Shanthi
Longman, Jo
Williams, Megan
Laycock, Alison
Matthews, Veronica
Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title_full Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title_short Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review
title_sort culturally informed australian aboriginal and torres strait islander evaluations: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510669
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146437
work_keys_str_mv AT vinekristina culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT benvenistetessa culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT ramanathanshanthi culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT longmanjo culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT williamsmegan culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT laycockalison culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview
AT matthewsveronica culturallyinformedaustralianaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderevaluationsascopingreview