Cargando…
The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520747 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010 |
_version_ | 1785080080147415040 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Yi Wang, Wen-Ping Ignee, Andre Zuo, Dan Qiu, Yi-Jie Zhang, Qi Lu, Xiu-Yun Chen, Sheng Dietrich, Christoph Frank |
author_facet | Dong, Yi Wang, Wen-Ping Ignee, Andre Zuo, Dan Qiu, Yi-Jie Zhang, Qi Lu, Xiu-Yun Chen, Sheng Dietrich, Christoph Frank |
author_sort | Dong, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12) (p <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2–5 cm) (p <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10379844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103798442023-07-29 The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions Dong, Yi Wang, Wen-Ping Ignee, Andre Zuo, Dan Qiu, Yi-Jie Zhang, Qi Lu, Xiu-Yun Chen, Sheng Dietrich, Christoph Frank J Ultrason Research Paper AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12) (p <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2–5 cm) (p <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors. Sciendo 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10379844/ /pubmed/37520747 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010 Text en © 2023 Yi Dong et al., published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Dong, Yi Wang, Wen-Ping Ignee, Andre Zuo, Dan Qiu, Yi-Jie Zhang, Qi Lu, Xiu-Yun Chen, Sheng Dietrich, Christoph Frank The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title | The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title_full | The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title_short | The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
title_sort | diagnostic value of doppler resistive index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520747 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongyi thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT wangwenping thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT igneeandre thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT zuodan thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT qiuyijie thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT zhangqi thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT luxiuyun thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT chensheng thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT dietrichchristophfrank thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT dongyi diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT wangwenping diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT igneeandre diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT zuodan diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT qiuyijie diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT zhangqi diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT luxiuyun diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT chensheng diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions AT dietrichchristophfrank diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions |