Cargando…

The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Yi, Wang, Wen-Ping, Ignee, Andre, Zuo, Dan, Qiu, Yi-Jie, Zhang, Qi, Lu, Xiu-Yun, Chen, Sheng, Dietrich, Christoph Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520747
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010
_version_ 1785080080147415040
author Dong, Yi
Wang, Wen-Ping
Ignee, Andre
Zuo, Dan
Qiu, Yi-Jie
Zhang, Qi
Lu, Xiu-Yun
Chen, Sheng
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
author_facet Dong, Yi
Wang, Wen-Ping
Ignee, Andre
Zuo, Dan
Qiu, Yi-Jie
Zhang, Qi
Lu, Xiu-Yun
Chen, Sheng
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
author_sort Dong, Yi
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12) (p <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2–5 cm) (p <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10379844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103798442023-07-29 The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions Dong, Yi Wang, Wen-Ping Ignee, Andre Zuo, Dan Qiu, Yi-Jie Zhang, Qi Lu, Xiu-Yun Chen, Sheng Dietrich, Christoph Frank J Ultrason Research Paper AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12) (p <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2–5 cm) (p <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors. Sciendo 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10379844/ /pubmed/37520747 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010 Text en © 2023 Yi Dong et al., published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Dong, Yi
Wang, Wen-Ping
Ignee, Andre
Zuo, Dan
Qiu, Yi-Jie
Zhang, Qi
Lu, Xiu-Yun
Chen, Sheng
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title_full The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title_fullStr The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title_short The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
title_sort diagnostic value of doppler resistive index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10379844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520747
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010
work_keys_str_mv AT dongyi thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT wangwenping thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT igneeandre thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT zuodan thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT qiuyijie thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT zhangqi thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT luxiuyun thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT chensheng thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT dietrichchristophfrank thediagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT dongyi diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT wangwenping diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT igneeandre diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT zuodan diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT qiuyijie diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT zhangqi diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT luxiuyun diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT chensheng diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions
AT dietrichchristophfrank diagnosticvalueofdopplerresistiveindexinthedifferentialdiagnosisoffocalliverlesions