Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion

The dental prophylactic cleaning of a damaged resin-based composite (RBC) restoration with sodium bicarbonate can change the surface characteristics and influence the repair bond strength. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB) and aluminum oxide (AO) surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Németh, Kinga Dorottya, Told, Roland, Szabó, Péter, Maróti, Péter, Szénai, Réka, Pintér, Zsolt Balázs, Lovász, Bálint Viktor, Szalma, József, Lempel, Edina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411568
_version_ 1785080162779398144
author Németh, Kinga Dorottya
Told, Roland
Szabó, Péter
Maróti, Péter
Szénai, Réka
Pintér, Zsolt Balázs
Lovász, Bálint Viktor
Szalma, József
Lempel, Edina
author_facet Németh, Kinga Dorottya
Told, Roland
Szabó, Péter
Maróti, Péter
Szénai, Réka
Pintér, Zsolt Balázs
Lovász, Bálint Viktor
Szalma, József
Lempel, Edina
author_sort Németh, Kinga Dorottya
collection PubMed
description The dental prophylactic cleaning of a damaged resin-based composite (RBC) restoration with sodium bicarbonate can change the surface characteristics and influence the repair bond strength. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB) and aluminum oxide (AO) surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of repaired, aged RBC. Bar specimens were prepared from microhybrid RBC and aged in deionized water for 8 weeks. Different surface treatments (AO air-abrasion; SB air-polishing), as well as cleaning (phosphoric acid, PA; ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid, EDTA) and adhesive applications (single bottle etch-and-rinse, ER; universal adhesive, UA), were used prior to the application of the repair RBC. Not aged and aged but not surface treated RBCs were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The repaired blocks were cut into sticks using a precision grinding machine. The specimens were tested for tensile fracture and the µTBS values were calculated. Surface characteristics were assessed using scanning electron microscopy. AO-PA-UA (62.6 MPa) showed a 20% increase in µTBS compared to the NC (50.2 MPa), which proved to be the most significant. This was followed by SB-EDTA-UA (58.9 MPa) with an increase of 15%. In addition to AO-PA-UA, SB-EDTA-UA could also be a viable alternative in the RBC repair protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10380324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103803242023-07-29 Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion Németh, Kinga Dorottya Told, Roland Szabó, Péter Maróti, Péter Szénai, Réka Pintér, Zsolt Balázs Lovász, Bálint Viktor Szalma, József Lempel, Edina Int J Mol Sci Article The dental prophylactic cleaning of a damaged resin-based composite (RBC) restoration with sodium bicarbonate can change the surface characteristics and influence the repair bond strength. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB) and aluminum oxide (AO) surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of repaired, aged RBC. Bar specimens were prepared from microhybrid RBC and aged in deionized water for 8 weeks. Different surface treatments (AO air-abrasion; SB air-polishing), as well as cleaning (phosphoric acid, PA; ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid, EDTA) and adhesive applications (single bottle etch-and-rinse, ER; universal adhesive, UA), were used prior to the application of the repair RBC. Not aged and aged but not surface treated RBCs were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The repaired blocks were cut into sticks using a precision grinding machine. The specimens were tested for tensile fracture and the µTBS values were calculated. Surface characteristics were assessed using scanning electron microscopy. AO-PA-UA (62.6 MPa) showed a 20% increase in µTBS compared to the NC (50.2 MPa), which proved to be the most significant. This was followed by SB-EDTA-UA (58.9 MPa) with an increase of 15%. In addition to AO-PA-UA, SB-EDTA-UA could also be a viable alternative in the RBC repair protocol. MDPI 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10380324/ /pubmed/37511327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411568 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Németh, Kinga Dorottya
Told, Roland
Szabó, Péter
Maróti, Péter
Szénai, Réka
Pintér, Zsolt Balázs
Lovász, Bálint Viktor
Szalma, József
Lempel, Edina
Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion
title_sort comparative evaluation of the repair bond strength of dental resin composite after sodium bicarbonate or aluminum oxide air-abrasion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411568
work_keys_str_mv AT nemethkingadorottya comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT toldroland comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT szabopeter comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT marotipeter comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT szenaireka comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT pinterzsoltbalazs comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT lovaszbalintviktor comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT szalmajozsef comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion
AT lempeledina comparativeevaluationoftherepairbondstrengthofdentalresincompositeaftersodiumbicarbonateoraluminumoxideairabrasion