Cargando…

Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy

Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akodad, Mariama, Meunier, Pierre-Alain, Padovani, Caroline, Cayla, Guillaume, Zitouni, Wassim, Macia, Jean-Christophe, Robert, Pierre, Steinecker, Matthieu, Roubille, François, Leclercq, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604
_version_ 1785080223604146176
author Akodad, Mariama
Meunier, Pierre-Alain
Padovani, Caroline
Cayla, Guillaume
Zitouni, Wassim
Macia, Jean-Christophe
Robert, Pierre
Steinecker, Matthieu
Roubille, François
Leclercq, Florence
author_facet Akodad, Mariama
Meunier, Pierre-Alain
Padovani, Caroline
Cayla, Guillaume
Zitouni, Wassim
Macia, Jean-Christophe
Robert, Pierre
Steinecker, Matthieu
Roubille, François
Leclercq, Florence
author_sort Akodad, Mariama
collection PubMed
description Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients were prospectively included after coronary angiography evaluation within 24 h and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when required. Patients were classified as high- or low-risk according to hemodynamics, rhythmic state, ischemic and bleeding risks. Major in-hospital outcomes were assessed. Results: From January to June 2021, 277 patients were enrolled (62.8% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 174); 37.2% with non-NSTEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 103). PCI was required for 260 patients (93.9%). Seventy-four patients (26.7%) were classified as low-risk (n = 47 NSTEMI; n= 27 STEMI) and 203 patients (73.3%) as high-risk of events. All patients were monitored in CICU. While 38 patients (18.7%) from the high-risk group reached the primary endpoint, mainly related to rhythmic or conduction disorder (n = 24, 11.8%) or unstable hemodynamics (n = 17; 8.4%), only 1 patient (1.3%) in the low-risk group had one major outcome (no fatal bleeding); p < 0.01. The negative predictive value of our patient stratification for the absence of major in-hospital outcome was 100% (CI95%: 100–100%) for STEMI and 97.9% [CI95%: 93.2–100%] for NSTEMI patients. Conclusions: Stratification of ACS patients after early coronary angiography and most of the time PCI, identify a population with very low risk of in-hospital events (1/4 of all ACS and 1/2 of NSTEMI) who may probably not require ECG monitoring and/or CICU admission. (NCT04378504).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10380550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103805502023-07-29 Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy Akodad, Mariama Meunier, Pierre-Alain Padovani, Caroline Cayla, Guillaume Zitouni, Wassim Macia, Jean-Christophe Robert, Pierre Steinecker, Matthieu Roubille, François Leclercq, Florence J Clin Med Article Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients were prospectively included after coronary angiography evaluation within 24 h and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when required. Patients were classified as high- or low-risk according to hemodynamics, rhythmic state, ischemic and bleeding risks. Major in-hospital outcomes were assessed. Results: From January to June 2021, 277 patients were enrolled (62.8% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 174); 37.2% with non-NSTEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 103). PCI was required for 260 patients (93.9%). Seventy-four patients (26.7%) were classified as low-risk (n = 47 NSTEMI; n= 27 STEMI) and 203 patients (73.3%) as high-risk of events. All patients were monitored in CICU. While 38 patients (18.7%) from the high-risk group reached the primary endpoint, mainly related to rhythmic or conduction disorder (n = 24, 11.8%) or unstable hemodynamics (n = 17; 8.4%), only 1 patient (1.3%) in the low-risk group had one major outcome (no fatal bleeding); p < 0.01. The negative predictive value of our patient stratification for the absence of major in-hospital outcome was 100% (CI95%: 100–100%) for STEMI and 97.9% [CI95%: 93.2–100%] for NSTEMI patients. Conclusions: Stratification of ACS patients after early coronary angiography and most of the time PCI, identify a population with very low risk of in-hospital events (1/4 of all ACS and 1/2 of NSTEMI) who may probably not require ECG monitoring and/or CICU admission. (NCT04378504). MDPI 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10380550/ /pubmed/37510718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Akodad, Mariama
Meunier, Pierre-Alain
Padovani, Caroline
Cayla, Guillaume
Zitouni, Wassim
Macia, Jean-Christophe
Robert, Pierre
Steinecker, Matthieu
Roubille, François
Leclercq, Florence
Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title_full Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title_fullStr Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title_short Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
title_sort identification of low- versus high-risk acute coronary syndrome for a selective ecg monitoring strategy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604
work_keys_str_mv AT akodadmariama identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT meunierpierrealain identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT padovanicaroline identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT caylaguillaume identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT zitouniwassim identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT maciajeanchristophe identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT robertpierre identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT steineckermatthieu identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT roubillefrancois identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy
AT leclercqflorence identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy