Cargando…
Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy
Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604 |
_version_ | 1785080223604146176 |
---|---|
author | Akodad, Mariama Meunier, Pierre-Alain Padovani, Caroline Cayla, Guillaume Zitouni, Wassim Macia, Jean-Christophe Robert, Pierre Steinecker, Matthieu Roubille, François Leclercq, Florence |
author_facet | Akodad, Mariama Meunier, Pierre-Alain Padovani, Caroline Cayla, Guillaume Zitouni, Wassim Macia, Jean-Christophe Robert, Pierre Steinecker, Matthieu Roubille, François Leclercq, Florence |
author_sort | Akodad, Mariama |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients were prospectively included after coronary angiography evaluation within 24 h and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when required. Patients were classified as high- or low-risk according to hemodynamics, rhythmic state, ischemic and bleeding risks. Major in-hospital outcomes were assessed. Results: From January to June 2021, 277 patients were enrolled (62.8% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 174); 37.2% with non-NSTEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 103). PCI was required for 260 patients (93.9%). Seventy-four patients (26.7%) were classified as low-risk (n = 47 NSTEMI; n= 27 STEMI) and 203 patients (73.3%) as high-risk of events. All patients were monitored in CICU. While 38 patients (18.7%) from the high-risk group reached the primary endpoint, mainly related to rhythmic or conduction disorder (n = 24, 11.8%) or unstable hemodynamics (n = 17; 8.4%), only 1 patient (1.3%) in the low-risk group had one major outcome (no fatal bleeding); p < 0.01. The negative predictive value of our patient stratification for the absence of major in-hospital outcome was 100% (CI95%: 100–100%) for STEMI and 97.9% [CI95%: 93.2–100%] for NSTEMI patients. Conclusions: Stratification of ACS patients after early coronary angiography and most of the time PCI, identify a population with very low risk of in-hospital events (1/4 of all ACS and 1/2 of NSTEMI) who may probably not require ECG monitoring and/or CICU admission. (NCT04378504). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10380550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103805502023-07-29 Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy Akodad, Mariama Meunier, Pierre-Alain Padovani, Caroline Cayla, Guillaume Zitouni, Wassim Macia, Jean-Christophe Robert, Pierre Steinecker, Matthieu Roubille, François Leclercq, Florence J Clin Med Article Background: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. Methods: Consecutive ACS patients were prospectively included after coronary angiography evaluation within 24 h and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when required. Patients were classified as high- or low-risk according to hemodynamics, rhythmic state, ischemic and bleeding risks. Major in-hospital outcomes were assessed. Results: From January to June 2021, 277 patients were enrolled (62.8% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 174); 37.2% with non-NSTEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 103). PCI was required for 260 patients (93.9%). Seventy-four patients (26.7%) were classified as low-risk (n = 47 NSTEMI; n= 27 STEMI) and 203 patients (73.3%) as high-risk of events. All patients were monitored in CICU. While 38 patients (18.7%) from the high-risk group reached the primary endpoint, mainly related to rhythmic or conduction disorder (n = 24, 11.8%) or unstable hemodynamics (n = 17; 8.4%), only 1 patient (1.3%) in the low-risk group had one major outcome (no fatal bleeding); p < 0.01. The negative predictive value of our patient stratification for the absence of major in-hospital outcome was 100% (CI95%: 100–100%) for STEMI and 97.9% [CI95%: 93.2–100%] for NSTEMI patients. Conclusions: Stratification of ACS patients after early coronary angiography and most of the time PCI, identify a population with very low risk of in-hospital events (1/4 of all ACS and 1/2 of NSTEMI) who may probably not require ECG monitoring and/or CICU admission. (NCT04378504). MDPI 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10380550/ /pubmed/37510718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Akodad, Mariama Meunier, Pierre-Alain Padovani, Caroline Cayla, Guillaume Zitouni, Wassim Macia, Jean-Christophe Robert, Pierre Steinecker, Matthieu Roubille, François Leclercq, Florence Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title | Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title_full | Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title_fullStr | Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title_short | Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy |
title_sort | identification of low- versus high-risk acute coronary syndrome for a selective ecg monitoring strategy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akodadmariama identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT meunierpierrealain identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT padovanicaroline identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT caylaguillaume identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT zitouniwassim identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT maciajeanchristophe identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT robertpierre identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT steineckermatthieu identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT roubillefrancois identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy AT leclercqflorence identificationoflowversushighriskacutecoronarysyndromeforaselectiveecgmonitoringstrategy |