Cargando…
Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review
Since December 2019, many drugs have been evaluated or advocated as potential treatments of SARS-CoV-2 induced disease (COVID-19), including many repositioned drugs and some others specifically developed for these diseases. They can be roughly classified into three categories according to their main...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144672 |
_version_ | 1785080237870022656 |
---|---|
author | Sixt, Thibault Moretto, Florian Esteve, Clementine Duong, Michel Buisson, Marielle Mahy, Sophie Blot, Mathieu Piroth, Lionel |
author_facet | Sixt, Thibault Moretto, Florian Esteve, Clementine Duong, Michel Buisson, Marielle Mahy, Sophie Blot, Mathieu Piroth, Lionel |
author_sort | Sixt, Thibault |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since December 2019, many drugs have been evaluated or advocated as potential treatments of SARS-CoV-2 induced disease (COVID-19), including many repositioned drugs and some others specifically developed for these diseases. They can be roughly classified into three categories according to their main mechanism of action (passive immunization, direct antivirals, and anti-inflammatory treatments), and their use depends on the stage of the disease. Despite often promising preclinical data, most of the treatments evaluated failed to show a significant clinical benefit. In addition, a few others have seen their effectiveness affected by the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and sub-variants. Herein, the aim of this article is to take stock of the data available as of the 14th of July 2022, concerning the specific healing options evaluated for patients suffering from COVID-19. We focus particularly on healing treatments of COVID-19 and do not deal with preventive treatments such as vaccine. Associated therapies such as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis are not detailed since they are covered in a specific chapter of this issue. Passive immunization, especially through monoclonal antibodies, showed a positive impact on the clinical evolution, whether in outpatients or inpatients without oxygen supply. However, their effectiveness strongly depends on the type of SARS-CoV-2 variant, and often decreases or even vanishes with the most recent variants. Among direct antiviral treatments, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir appears to currently be the cornerstone in the management of early infections, but its use may be limited by drug interactions. Remdesivir remains as an alternative in this situation, even though it is potentially less convenient. Anti-inflammatory treatments have often been shown to be the most effective in inpatients with oxygen supply. Dexamethasone is now a cornerstone of management of these patients. Added tocilizumab seems beneficial in the case of hyper inflammation. JAK inhibitors and anakinra have also gained an interest in some studies. As a conclusion of this narrative review, the best treatment strategy has yet to be defined and is likely to evolve in the future, not only because many other drugs are still under development and evaluation, but also because of the viral epidemics and epidemiology evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10380607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103806072023-07-29 Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review Sixt, Thibault Moretto, Florian Esteve, Clementine Duong, Michel Buisson, Marielle Mahy, Sophie Blot, Mathieu Piroth, Lionel J Clin Med Review Since December 2019, many drugs have been evaluated or advocated as potential treatments of SARS-CoV-2 induced disease (COVID-19), including many repositioned drugs and some others specifically developed for these diseases. They can be roughly classified into three categories according to their main mechanism of action (passive immunization, direct antivirals, and anti-inflammatory treatments), and their use depends on the stage of the disease. Despite often promising preclinical data, most of the treatments evaluated failed to show a significant clinical benefit. In addition, a few others have seen their effectiveness affected by the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and sub-variants. Herein, the aim of this article is to take stock of the data available as of the 14th of July 2022, concerning the specific healing options evaluated for patients suffering from COVID-19. We focus particularly on healing treatments of COVID-19 and do not deal with preventive treatments such as vaccine. Associated therapies such as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis are not detailed since they are covered in a specific chapter of this issue. Passive immunization, especially through monoclonal antibodies, showed a positive impact on the clinical evolution, whether in outpatients or inpatients without oxygen supply. However, their effectiveness strongly depends on the type of SARS-CoV-2 variant, and often decreases or even vanishes with the most recent variants. Among direct antiviral treatments, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir appears to currently be the cornerstone in the management of early infections, but its use may be limited by drug interactions. Remdesivir remains as an alternative in this situation, even though it is potentially less convenient. Anti-inflammatory treatments have often been shown to be the most effective in inpatients with oxygen supply. Dexamethasone is now a cornerstone of management of these patients. Added tocilizumab seems beneficial in the case of hyper inflammation. JAK inhibitors and anakinra have also gained an interest in some studies. As a conclusion of this narrative review, the best treatment strategy has yet to be defined and is likely to evolve in the future, not only because many other drugs are still under development and evaluation, but also because of the viral epidemics and epidemiology evolution. MDPI 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10380607/ /pubmed/37510786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144672 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Sixt, Thibault Moretto, Florian Esteve, Clementine Duong, Michel Buisson, Marielle Mahy, Sophie Blot, Mathieu Piroth, Lionel Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title | Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title_full | Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title_short | Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | healing treatments in covid-19 patients: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sixtthibault healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT morettoflorian healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT esteveclementine healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT duongmichel healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT buissonmarielle healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT mahysophie healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT blotmathieu healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview AT pirothlionel healingtreatmentsincovid19patientsanarrativereview |