Cargando…
Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up
Total bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency is a pathologic condition of the ocular surface due to the loss of corneal stem cells. Cultivated oral mucosa epithelial transplantation (COMET) is the only autologous successful treatment for this pathology in clinical application, although abnormal perip...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411522 |
_version_ | 1785080309504540672 |
---|---|
author | Attico, Eustachio Galaverni, Giulia Torello, Andrea Bianchi, Elisa Bonacorsi, Susanna Losi, Lorena Manfredini, Rossella Lambiase, Alessandro Rama, Paolo Pellegrini, Graziella |
author_facet | Attico, Eustachio Galaverni, Giulia Torello, Andrea Bianchi, Elisa Bonacorsi, Susanna Losi, Lorena Manfredini, Rossella Lambiase, Alessandro Rama, Paolo Pellegrini, Graziella |
author_sort | Attico, Eustachio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Total bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency is a pathologic condition of the ocular surface due to the loss of corneal stem cells. Cultivated oral mucosa epithelial transplantation (COMET) is the only autologous successful treatment for this pathology in clinical application, although abnormal peripheric corneal vascularization often occurs. Properly characterizing the regenerated ocular surface is needed for a reliable follow-up. So far, the univocal identification of transplanted oral mucosa has been challenging. Previously proposed markers were shown to be co-expressed by different ocular surface epithelia in a homeostatic or perturbated environment. In this study, we compared the transcriptome profile of human oral mucosa, limbal and conjunctival cultured holoclones, identifying Paired Like Homeodomain 2 (PITX2) as a new marker that univocally distinguishes the transplanted oral tissue from the other epithelia. We validated PITX2 at RNA and protein levels to investigate 10-year follow-up corneal samples derived from a COMET-treated aniridic patient. Moreover, we found novel angiogenesis-related factors that were differentially expressed in the three epithelia and instrumental in explaining the neovascularization in COMET-treated patients. These results will support the follow-up analysis of patients transplanted with oral mucosa and provide new tools to understand the regeneration mechanism of transplanted corneas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10380900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103809002023-07-29 Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up Attico, Eustachio Galaverni, Giulia Torello, Andrea Bianchi, Elisa Bonacorsi, Susanna Losi, Lorena Manfredini, Rossella Lambiase, Alessandro Rama, Paolo Pellegrini, Graziella Int J Mol Sci Article Total bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency is a pathologic condition of the ocular surface due to the loss of corneal stem cells. Cultivated oral mucosa epithelial transplantation (COMET) is the only autologous successful treatment for this pathology in clinical application, although abnormal peripheric corneal vascularization often occurs. Properly characterizing the regenerated ocular surface is needed for a reliable follow-up. So far, the univocal identification of transplanted oral mucosa has been challenging. Previously proposed markers were shown to be co-expressed by different ocular surface epithelia in a homeostatic or perturbated environment. In this study, we compared the transcriptome profile of human oral mucosa, limbal and conjunctival cultured holoclones, identifying Paired Like Homeodomain 2 (PITX2) as a new marker that univocally distinguishes the transplanted oral tissue from the other epithelia. We validated PITX2 at RNA and protein levels to investigate 10-year follow-up corneal samples derived from a COMET-treated aniridic patient. Moreover, we found novel angiogenesis-related factors that were differentially expressed in the three epithelia and instrumental in explaining the neovascularization in COMET-treated patients. These results will support the follow-up analysis of patients transplanted with oral mucosa and provide new tools to understand the regeneration mechanism of transplanted corneas. MDPI 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10380900/ /pubmed/37511281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411522 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Attico, Eustachio Galaverni, Giulia Torello, Andrea Bianchi, Elisa Bonacorsi, Susanna Losi, Lorena Manfredini, Rossella Lambiase, Alessandro Rama, Paolo Pellegrini, Graziella Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title | Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title_full | Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title_short | Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up |
title_sort | comparison between cultivated oral mucosa and ocular surface epithelia for comet patients follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atticoeustachio comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT galavernigiulia comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT torelloandrea comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT bianchielisa comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT bonacorsisusanna comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT losilorena comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT manfredinirossella comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT lambiasealessandro comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT ramapaolo comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup AT pellegrinigraziella comparisonbetweencultivatedoralmucosaandocularsurfaceepitheliaforcometpatientsfollowup |