Cargando…

Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis. And to construct prediction models to aid in the prediction and improvement of prognosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Delin, Liu, Mingkun, Zhai, Xiangyu, Li, Xianzhi, Jin, Bin, Liu, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1215745
_version_ 1785080319670484992
author Ma, Delin
Liu, Mingkun
Zhai, Xiangyu
Li, Xianzhi
Jin, Bin
Liu, Yang
author_facet Ma, Delin
Liu, Mingkun
Zhai, Xiangyu
Li, Xianzhi
Jin, Bin
Liu, Yang
author_sort Ma, Delin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis. And to construct prediction models to aid in the prediction and improvement of prognosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception to March 29, 2023. After completing literature screening and data extraction, we performed meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS. Using the pooled hazard ratio value for each risk factor, we constructed prediction models, which were then validated using datasets from 19 centers in Japan and two centers in China, comprising a total of 204 patients. RESULTS: A total of 47 studies, involving a total of 7649 ICI-treated HCC patients, were included in the meta-analysis. After analyzing 18 risk factors, we identified AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number, vascular invasion and combination therapy as predictors for OS prediction model, while AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number and vascular invasion were selected as predictors for PFS model. To validate the models, we scored two independent cohorts of patients using both prediction models. Our models demonstrated good performance in these cohorts. In addition, in the pooled cohort of 204 patients, Our models also showed good performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.712, 0.753, and 0.822 for the OS prediction model at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year follow-up points, respectively, and AUC values of 0.575, 0.749 and 0.691 for the PFS prediction model Additionally, the calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves in the pooled cohort all supported the validity of both models. CONCLUSION: Based on the meta-analysis, we successfully constructed the OS and PFS prediction models for ICI-treated HCC patients. We also validated the models externally and observed good discrimination and calibration. The model’s selected indicators are easily obtainable, making them suitable for further application in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10380940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103809402023-07-29 Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts Ma, Delin Liu, Mingkun Zhai, Xiangyu Li, Xianzhi Jin, Bin Liu, Yang Front Immunol Immunology OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis. And to construct prediction models to aid in the prediction and improvement of prognosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception to March 29, 2023. After completing literature screening and data extraction, we performed meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS. Using the pooled hazard ratio value for each risk factor, we constructed prediction models, which were then validated using datasets from 19 centers in Japan and two centers in China, comprising a total of 204 patients. RESULTS: A total of 47 studies, involving a total of 7649 ICI-treated HCC patients, were included in the meta-analysis. After analyzing 18 risk factors, we identified AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number, vascular invasion and combination therapy as predictors for OS prediction model, while AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number and vascular invasion were selected as predictors for PFS model. To validate the models, we scored two independent cohorts of patients using both prediction models. Our models demonstrated good performance in these cohorts. In addition, in the pooled cohort of 204 patients, Our models also showed good performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.712, 0.753, and 0.822 for the OS prediction model at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year follow-up points, respectively, and AUC values of 0.575, 0.749 and 0.691 for the PFS prediction model Additionally, the calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves in the pooled cohort all supported the validity of both models. CONCLUSION: Based on the meta-analysis, we successfully constructed the OS and PFS prediction models for ICI-treated HCC patients. We also validated the models externally and observed good discrimination and calibration. The model’s selected indicators are easily obtainable, making them suitable for further application in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10380940/ /pubmed/37520554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1215745 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ma, Liu, Zhai, Li, Jin and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Ma, Delin
Liu, Mingkun
Zhai, Xiangyu
Li, Xianzhi
Jin, Bin
Liu, Yang
Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title_full Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title_fullStr Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title_short Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
title_sort development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1215745
work_keys_str_mv AT madelin developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts
AT liumingkun developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts
AT zhaixiangyu developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts
AT lixianzhi developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts
AT jinbin developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts
AT liuyang developmentandvalidationofprognosticriskpredictionmodelsforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof47cohorts