Cargando…

Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Measurements of experimental errors between controlled laboratory bioassays and field response of insecticide on immature stages of the sweetpotato whitefly were investigated using parallel sample populations. The bioassays were more precise in measuring insecticide efficacy compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cremonez, Paulo S. G., Perier, Jermaine D., Nagaoka, Mirela M., Simmons, Alvin M., Riley, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14070645
_version_ 1785080333226475520
author Cremonez, Paulo S. G.
Perier, Jermaine D.
Nagaoka, Mirela M.
Simmons, Alvin M.
Riley, David G.
author_facet Cremonez, Paulo S. G.
Perier, Jermaine D.
Nagaoka, Mirela M.
Simmons, Alvin M.
Riley, David G.
author_sort Cremonez, Paulo S. G.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Measurements of experimental errors between controlled laboratory bioassays and field response of insecticide on immature stages of the sweetpotato whitefly were investigated using parallel sample populations. The bioassays were more precise in measuring insecticide efficacy compared to homologous field trials. Seasonal variations in precision and accuracy indicate the importance of identifying and considering external confounding factors when estimating insecticide efficacy or predicting field response through bioassays. These results highlight the value and limitations of using quick, viable, and easy-to-set-up bioassays to quantify the efficacy of commonly used products on target pest species, particularly those commonly associated with insecticide resistance, using the sweetpotato whitefly as a model. ABSTRACT: Ecotoxicological studies often result in reports on the limitation and sometime failures of biological assay data to predict field response to similar treatments. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that controlled bioassays can better quantify the specific mortality response of a target pest species to a specific toxin. To quantify the relationship between whitefly bioassay and field response data, we evaluated a controlled laboratory bioassay and a concurrent cucurbit field trial method to assess insecticide efficacy for controlling the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). This was based on oviposition and nymphal development. We specifically tested the assumptions that a maximum dose bioassay would more precisely measure insecticide efficacy as compared with a comparable field spray test evaluation, and the response would be equal between the bioassay and the field as a measure of control accuracy for both adult oviposition and development of nymphal stages. To make a direct comparison, we tested the same whitefly population subsamples from 352 plots in eight cucurbit field experiments in Georgia, USA, in 2021 and 2022. The bioassays provide significantly precision for estimating proportional whitefly response. As expected, treatment-specific nonequivalence in immature whitefly counts between the bioassay and field, i.e., a lack of accuracy, only occurred with insecticides that were not highly toxic to all growth stages of whiteflies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10380993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103809932023-07-29 Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci Cremonez, Paulo S. G. Perier, Jermaine D. Nagaoka, Mirela M. Simmons, Alvin M. Riley, David G. Insects Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Measurements of experimental errors between controlled laboratory bioassays and field response of insecticide on immature stages of the sweetpotato whitefly were investigated using parallel sample populations. The bioassays were more precise in measuring insecticide efficacy compared to homologous field trials. Seasonal variations in precision and accuracy indicate the importance of identifying and considering external confounding factors when estimating insecticide efficacy or predicting field response through bioassays. These results highlight the value and limitations of using quick, viable, and easy-to-set-up bioassays to quantify the efficacy of commonly used products on target pest species, particularly those commonly associated with insecticide resistance, using the sweetpotato whitefly as a model. ABSTRACT: Ecotoxicological studies often result in reports on the limitation and sometime failures of biological assay data to predict field response to similar treatments. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that controlled bioassays can better quantify the specific mortality response of a target pest species to a specific toxin. To quantify the relationship between whitefly bioassay and field response data, we evaluated a controlled laboratory bioassay and a concurrent cucurbit field trial method to assess insecticide efficacy for controlling the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). This was based on oviposition and nymphal development. We specifically tested the assumptions that a maximum dose bioassay would more precisely measure insecticide efficacy as compared with a comparable field spray test evaluation, and the response would be equal between the bioassay and the field as a measure of control accuracy for both adult oviposition and development of nymphal stages. To make a direct comparison, we tested the same whitefly population subsamples from 352 plots in eight cucurbit field experiments in Georgia, USA, in 2021 and 2022. The bioassays provide significantly precision for estimating proportional whitefly response. As expected, treatment-specific nonequivalence in immature whitefly counts between the bioassay and field, i.e., a lack of accuracy, only occurred with insecticides that were not highly toxic to all growth stages of whiteflies. MDPI 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10380993/ /pubmed/37504651 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14070645 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cremonez, Paulo S. G.
Perier, Jermaine D.
Nagaoka, Mirela M.
Simmons, Alvin M.
Riley, David G.
Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title_full Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title_fullStr Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title_full_unstemmed Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title_short Precision and Accuracy of Field Versus Laboratory Bioassay Insecticide Efficacy for the Control of Immature Bemisia tabaci
title_sort precision and accuracy of field versus laboratory bioassay insecticide efficacy for the control of immature bemisia tabaci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10380993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37504651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14070645
work_keys_str_mv AT cremonezpaulosg precisionandaccuracyoffieldversuslaboratorybioassayinsecticideefficacyforthecontrolofimmaturebemisiatabaci
AT perierjermained precisionandaccuracyoffieldversuslaboratorybioassayinsecticideefficacyforthecontrolofimmaturebemisiatabaci
AT nagaokamirelam precisionandaccuracyoffieldversuslaboratorybioassayinsecticideefficacyforthecontrolofimmaturebemisiatabaci
AT simmonsalvinm precisionandaccuracyoffieldversuslaboratorybioassayinsecticideefficacyforthecontrolofimmaturebemisiatabaci
AT rileydavidg precisionandaccuracyoffieldversuslaboratorybioassayinsecticideefficacyforthecontrolofimmaturebemisiatabaci