Cargando…

Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists for how patient preference elicitation methods compare directly. This study compares a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing-weighting (SW) by eliciting preferences for glucose-monitoring devices in a population of diabetes patients. METHODS: A sample of Du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whichello, Chiara, Smith, Ian, Veldwijk, Jorien, de Wit, G. Ardine, Rutten- van Molken, Maureen P. M. H., de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37506078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283926
_version_ 1785080342089039872
author Whichello, Chiara
Smith, Ian
Veldwijk, Jorien
de Wit, G. Ardine
Rutten- van Molken, Maureen P. M. H.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
author_facet Whichello, Chiara
Smith, Ian
Veldwijk, Jorien
de Wit, G. Ardine
Rutten- van Molken, Maureen P. M. H.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
author_sort Whichello, Chiara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists for how patient preference elicitation methods compare directly. This study compares a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing-weighting (SW) by eliciting preferences for glucose-monitoring devices in a population of diabetes patients. METHODS: A sample of Dutch adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes (n = 459) completed an online survey assessing their preferences for glucose-monitoring devices, consisting of both a DCE and a SW exercise. Half the sample completed the DCE first; the other half completed the SW first. For the DCE, the relative importance of the attributes of the devices was determined using a mixed-logit model. For the SW, the relative importance of the attributes was based on ranks and points allocated to the ‘swing’ from the worst to the best level of the attribute. The preference outcomes and self-reported response burden were directly compared between the two methods. RESULTS: Participants reported they perceived the DCE to be easier to understand and answer compared to the SW. Both methods revealed that cost and precision of the device were the most important attributes. However, the DCE had a 14.9-fold difference between the most and least important attribute, while the SW had a 1.4-fold difference. The weights derived from the SW were almost evenly distributed between all attributes. CONCLUSIONS: The DCE was better received by participants, and generated larger weight differences between each attribute level, making it the more informative method in our case study. This method comparison provides further evidence of the degree of method suitability and trustworthiness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10381030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103810302023-07-29 Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices Whichello, Chiara Smith, Ian Veldwijk, Jorien de Wit, G. Ardine Rutten- van Molken, Maureen P. M. H. de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists for how patient preference elicitation methods compare directly. This study compares a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing-weighting (SW) by eliciting preferences for glucose-monitoring devices in a population of diabetes patients. METHODS: A sample of Dutch adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes (n = 459) completed an online survey assessing their preferences for glucose-monitoring devices, consisting of both a DCE and a SW exercise. Half the sample completed the DCE first; the other half completed the SW first. For the DCE, the relative importance of the attributes of the devices was determined using a mixed-logit model. For the SW, the relative importance of the attributes was based on ranks and points allocated to the ‘swing’ from the worst to the best level of the attribute. The preference outcomes and self-reported response burden were directly compared between the two methods. RESULTS: Participants reported they perceived the DCE to be easier to understand and answer compared to the SW. Both methods revealed that cost and precision of the device were the most important attributes. However, the DCE had a 14.9-fold difference between the most and least important attribute, while the SW had a 1.4-fold difference. The weights derived from the SW were almost evenly distributed between all attributes. CONCLUSIONS: The DCE was better received by participants, and generated larger weight differences between each attribute level, making it the more informative method in our case study. This method comparison provides further evidence of the degree of method suitability and trustworthiness. Public Library of Science 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10381030/ /pubmed/37506078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283926 Text en © 2023 Whichello et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Whichello, Chiara
Smith, Ian
Veldwijk, Jorien
de Wit, G. Ardine
Rutten- van Molken, Maureen P. M. H.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title_full Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title_fullStr Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title_full_unstemmed Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title_short Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
title_sort discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: a head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37506078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283926
work_keys_str_mv AT whichellochiara discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices
AT smithian discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices
AT veldwijkjorien discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices
AT dewitgardine discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices
AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureenpmh discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices
AT debekkergrobestherw discretechoiceexperimentversusswingweightingaheadtoheadcomparisonofdiabeticpatientpreferencesforglucosemonitoringdevices