Cargando…

Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice

Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nissen, Tobias P. H., Nørgaard, Thomas L., Schielke, Katja C., Vestergaard, Peter, Nikontovic, Amar, Dawidowicz, Malgorzata, Grauslund, Jakob, Vorum, Henrik, Aasbjerg, Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128
_version_ 1785080462954201088
author Nissen, Tobias P. H.
Nørgaard, Thomas L.
Schielke, Katja C.
Vestergaard, Peter
Nikontovic, Amar
Dawidowicz, Malgorzata
Grauslund, Jakob
Vorum, Henrik
Aasbjerg, Kristian
author_facet Nissen, Tobias P. H.
Nørgaard, Thomas L.
Schielke, Katja C.
Vestergaard, Peter
Nikontovic, Amar
Dawidowicz, Malgorzata
Grauslund, Jakob
Vorum, Henrik
Aasbjerg, Kristian
author_sort Nissen, Tobias P. H.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye per patient—participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists’ gradings. Results: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8–87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8–92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7–94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2–84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2–89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8–88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3–91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5–86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger’s Exact Kappa was 0.827. Conclusion: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10381514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103815142023-07-29 Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice Nissen, Tobias P. H. Nørgaard, Thomas L. Schielke, Katja C. Vestergaard, Peter Nikontovic, Amar Dawidowicz, Malgorzata Grauslund, Jakob Vorum, Henrik Aasbjerg, Kristian J Pers Med Article Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye per patient—participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists’ gradings. Results: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8–87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8–92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7–94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2–84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2–89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8–88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3–91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5–86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger’s Exact Kappa was 0.827. Conclusion: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted. MDPI 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10381514/ /pubmed/37511741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nissen, Tobias P. H.
Nørgaard, Thomas L.
Schielke, Katja C.
Vestergaard, Peter
Nikontovic, Amar
Dawidowicz, Malgorzata
Grauslund, Jakob
Vorum, Henrik
Aasbjerg, Kristian
Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title_full Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title_short Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
title_sort performance of a support vector machine learning tool for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128
work_keys_str_mv AT nissentobiasph performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT nørgaardthomasl performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT schielkekatjac performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT vestergaardpeter performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT nikontovicamar performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT dawidowiczmalgorzata performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT grauslundjakob performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT vorumhenrik performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice
AT aasbjergkristian performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice