Cargando…
Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice
Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128 |
_version_ | 1785080462954201088 |
---|---|
author | Nissen, Tobias P. H. Nørgaard, Thomas L. Schielke, Katja C. Vestergaard, Peter Nikontovic, Amar Dawidowicz, Malgorzata Grauslund, Jakob Vorum, Henrik Aasbjerg, Kristian |
author_facet | Nissen, Tobias P. H. Nørgaard, Thomas L. Schielke, Katja C. Vestergaard, Peter Nikontovic, Amar Dawidowicz, Malgorzata Grauslund, Jakob Vorum, Henrik Aasbjerg, Kristian |
author_sort | Nissen, Tobias P. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye per patient—participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists’ gradings. Results: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8–87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8–92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7–94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2–84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2–89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8–88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3–91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5–86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger’s Exact Kappa was 0.827. Conclusion: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10381514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103815142023-07-29 Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice Nissen, Tobias P. H. Nørgaard, Thomas L. Schielke, Katja C. Vestergaard, Peter Nikontovic, Amar Dawidowicz, Malgorzata Grauslund, Jakob Vorum, Henrik Aasbjerg, Kristian J Pers Med Article Purpose: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. Methods: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients—one eye per patient—participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists’ gradings. Results: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8–87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8–92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7–94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2–84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2–89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8–88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3–91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5–86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger’s Exact Kappa was 0.827. Conclusion: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted. MDPI 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10381514/ /pubmed/37511741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nissen, Tobias P. H. Nørgaard, Thomas L. Schielke, Katja C. Vestergaard, Peter Nikontovic, Amar Dawidowicz, Malgorzata Grauslund, Jakob Vorum, Henrik Aasbjerg, Kristian Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title | Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title_full | Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title_short | Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice |
title_sort | performance of a support vector machine learning tool for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in clinical practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10381514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nissentobiasph performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT nørgaardthomasl performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT schielkekatjac performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT vestergaardpeter performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT nikontovicamar performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT dawidowiczmalgorzata performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT grauslundjakob performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT vorumhenrik performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice AT aasbjergkristian performanceofasupportvectormachinelearningtoolfordiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinclinicalpractice |