Cargando…
Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study
Background: The use of human dentin matrix could serve as an alternative to autologous, allogenic, and xenogeneic bone grafts due to its osteoinductive characteristics. The limitations of its use is tooth availability and that it is often necessary to mix it with a biomaterial. Aim: The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16144945 |
_version_ | 1785080594532663296 |
---|---|
author | Minetti, Elio Palermo, Andrea Savadori, Paolo Patano, Assunta Inchingolo, Alessio Danilo Rapone, Biagio Malcangi, Giuseppina Inchingolo, Francesco Dipalma, Gianna Tartaglia, Francesco Carlo Inchingolo, Angelo Michele |
author_facet | Minetti, Elio Palermo, Andrea Savadori, Paolo Patano, Assunta Inchingolo, Alessio Danilo Rapone, Biagio Malcangi, Giuseppina Inchingolo, Francesco Dipalma, Gianna Tartaglia, Francesco Carlo Inchingolo, Angelo Michele |
author_sort | Minetti, Elio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The use of human dentin matrix could serve as an alternative to autologous, allogenic, and xenogeneic bone grafts due to its osteoinductive characteristics. The limitations of its use is tooth availability and that it is often necessary to mix it with a biomaterial. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze a mix of two different graft materials with different reabsorption ranges when the dentin graft material was not sufficient for full socket preservation. Methods: Seven socket preservation surgeries were carried out employing a mixed graft material containing 50% dentin and 50% xenograft. After four months of recovery, the implants were positioned. At the time of the prosthesis placement and implant surgery, bone samples were collected. Results: The histologic analysis revealed no inflammatory or infective reaction against the seven biopsies. The histomorphometric graft analysis revealed an amount of New Bone of 29.03 ± 6.57% after 4 months and 34.11 ± 5.02% after 8 months. Conclusions: The two graft materials had a different volume reabsorption rate: 71% after 4 months and 90% after 8 months for dentin, and 6% after 4 months and 26% after 8 months for the xenograft. The space created by the dentin reabsorption increased the quantity of new bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10382043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103820432023-07-29 Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study Minetti, Elio Palermo, Andrea Savadori, Paolo Patano, Assunta Inchingolo, Alessio Danilo Rapone, Biagio Malcangi, Giuseppina Inchingolo, Francesco Dipalma, Gianna Tartaglia, Francesco Carlo Inchingolo, Angelo Michele Materials (Basel) Article Background: The use of human dentin matrix could serve as an alternative to autologous, allogenic, and xenogeneic bone grafts due to its osteoinductive characteristics. The limitations of its use is tooth availability and that it is often necessary to mix it with a biomaterial. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze a mix of two different graft materials with different reabsorption ranges when the dentin graft material was not sufficient for full socket preservation. Methods: Seven socket preservation surgeries were carried out employing a mixed graft material containing 50% dentin and 50% xenograft. After four months of recovery, the implants were positioned. At the time of the prosthesis placement and implant surgery, bone samples were collected. Results: The histologic analysis revealed no inflammatory or infective reaction against the seven biopsies. The histomorphometric graft analysis revealed an amount of New Bone of 29.03 ± 6.57% after 4 months and 34.11 ± 5.02% after 8 months. Conclusions: The two graft materials had a different volume reabsorption rate: 71% after 4 months and 90% after 8 months for dentin, and 6% after 4 months and 26% after 8 months for the xenograft. The space created by the dentin reabsorption increased the quantity of new bone. MDPI 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10382043/ /pubmed/37512221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16144945 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Minetti, Elio Palermo, Andrea Savadori, Paolo Patano, Assunta Inchingolo, Alessio Danilo Rapone, Biagio Malcangi, Giuseppina Inchingolo, Francesco Dipalma, Gianna Tartaglia, Francesco Carlo Inchingolo, Angelo Michele Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title | Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Socket Preservation Using Dentin Mixed with Xenograft Materials: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | socket preservation using dentin mixed with xenograft materials: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16144945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minettielio socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT palermoandrea socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT savadoripaolo socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT patanoassunta socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT inchingoloalessiodanilo socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT raponebiagio socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT malcangigiuseppina socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT inchingolofrancesco socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT dipalmagianna socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT tartagliafrancescocarlo socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy AT inchingoloangelomichele socketpreservationusingdentinmixedwithxenograftmaterialsapilotstudy |