Cargando…

Association Between Claims‐Defined Frailty and Outcomes Following 30 Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings From the EXTEND‐DAPT Study

BACKGROUND: Frailty is rarely assessed in clinical trials of patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention. This study investigated whether frailty defined using claims data is associated with outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faridi, Kamil F., Strom, Jordan B., Kundi, Harun, Butala, Neel M., Curtis, Jeptha P., Gao, Qi, Song, Yang, Zheng, Luke, Tamez, Hector, Shen, Changyu, Secemsky, Eric A., Yeh, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.029588
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Frailty is rarely assessed in clinical trials of patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention. This study investigated whether frailty defined using claims data is associated with outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and if there is a differential association in patients receiving standard versus extended duration DAPT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients ≥65 years of age in the DAPT (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) Study, a randomized trial comparing 30 versus 12 months of DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention, had data linked to Medicare claims (n=1326), and a previously validated claims‐based index was used to define frailty. Net adverse clinical events, a composite of all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding, were compared between frail and nonfrail patients. Patients defined as frail using claims data (12.0% of the cohort) had higher incidence of net adverse clinical events (23.1%) compared with nonfrail patients (10.7%; P<0.001) at 18‐month follow‐up and increased risk after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.24 [95% CI, 1.38–3.63]). There were no differences in effects of extended duration DAPT on net adverse clinical events for frail (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.73–2.75]) and nonfrail patients (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.83–1.68]; interaction P=0.61), although analyses were underpowered. Bleeding was highest among frail patients who received extended duration DAPT. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients in the DAPT Study, claims‐defined frailty was associated with higher net adverse clinical events. Effects of extended duration DAPT were not different for frail patients, although comparisons were underpowered. Further investigation of how frailty influences ischemic and bleeding risks with DAPT are warranted. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00977938.