Cargando…

Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention

INTRODUCTION: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurth, Julia Katharina, Albrecht, Martin, Glaser, Karin, Karsten, Ulf, Vestergaard, Gisle, Armbruster, Martin, Kublik, Susanne, Schmid, Christoph A. O., Schloter, Michael, Schulz, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958
_version_ 1785080628374405120
author Kurth, Julia Katharina
Albrecht, Martin
Glaser, Karin
Karsten, Ulf
Vestergaard, Gisle
Armbruster, Martin
Kublik, Susanne
Schmid, Christoph A. O.
Schloter, Michael
Schulz, Stefanie
author_facet Kurth, Julia Katharina
Albrecht, Martin
Glaser, Karin
Karsten, Ulf
Vestergaard, Gisle
Armbruster, Martin
Kublik, Susanne
Schmid, Christoph A. O.
Schloter, Michael
Schulz, Stefanie
author_sort Kurth, Julia Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes. METHODS: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10382179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103821792023-07-29 Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention Kurth, Julia Katharina Albrecht, Martin Glaser, Karin Karsten, Ulf Vestergaard, Gisle Armbruster, Martin Kublik, Susanne Schmid, Christoph A. O. Schloter, Michael Schulz, Stefanie Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes. METHODS: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10382179/ /pubmed/37520365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kurth, Albrecht, Glaser, Karsten, Vestergaard, Armbruster, Kublik, Schmid, Schloter and Schulz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Kurth, Julia Katharina
Albrecht, Martin
Glaser, Karin
Karsten, Ulf
Vestergaard, Gisle
Armbruster, Martin
Kublik, Susanne
Schmid, Christoph A. O.
Schloter, Michael
Schulz, Stefanie
Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title_full Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title_fullStr Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title_full_unstemmed Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title_short Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
title_sort biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958
work_keys_str_mv AT kurthjuliakatharina biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT albrechtmartin biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT glaserkarin biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT karstenulf biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT vestergaardgisle biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT armbrustermartin biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT kubliksusanne biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT schmidchristophao biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT schlotermichael biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention
AT schulzstefanie biologicalsoilcrustsonagriculturalsoilsofmesicregionspromotemicrobialcrosskingdomcooccurrencesandnutrientretention