Cargando…

Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21

BACKGROUND: Despite substantial progress in improving maternal and newborn health, India continues to experience high rates of newborn mortality and stillbirths. One reason may be that many births happen in health facilities that lack advanced services—such as Caesarean section, blood transfusion, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tandon, Ajay, Roder-DeWan, Sanam, Chopra, Mickey, Chhabra, Sheena, Croke, Kevin, Cros, Marion, Hasan, Rifat, Jammy, Guru Rajesh, Manchanda, Navneet, Nagaraj, Amith, Pandey, Rahul, Pradhan, Elina, Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil, Peters, Michael A., Kruk, Margaret E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100253
_version_ 1785080720133193728
author Tandon, Ajay
Roder-DeWan, Sanam
Chopra, Mickey
Chhabra, Sheena
Croke, Kevin
Cros, Marion
Hasan, Rifat
Jammy, Guru Rajesh
Manchanda, Navneet
Nagaraj, Amith
Pandey, Rahul
Pradhan, Elina
Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil
Peters, Michael A.
Kruk, Margaret E.
author_facet Tandon, Ajay
Roder-DeWan, Sanam
Chopra, Mickey
Chhabra, Sheena
Croke, Kevin
Cros, Marion
Hasan, Rifat
Jammy, Guru Rajesh
Manchanda, Navneet
Nagaraj, Amith
Pandey, Rahul
Pradhan, Elina
Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil
Peters, Michael A.
Kruk, Margaret E.
author_sort Tandon, Ajay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite substantial progress in improving maternal and newborn health, India continues to experience high rates of newborn mortality and stillbirths. One reason may be that many births happen in health facilities that lack advanced services—such as Caesarean section, blood transfusion, or newborn intensive care. Stratification based on pregnancy risk factors is used to guide ‘high-risk’ women to advanced facilities. To assess the utility of risk stratification for guiding the choice of facility, we estimated the frequency of adverse newborn outcomes among women classified as ‘low risk’ in India. METHODS: We used the 2019–21 Fifth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5)—India’s Demographic and Health Survey—which includes modules administered to women aged 15–49 years. In addition to pregnancy history and outcomes, the survey collected a range of risk factors, including biomarkers. We used national obstetric risk guidelines to classify women as ‘high risk’ versus ‘low risk’ and assessed the frequency of stillbirths, newborn deaths, and unplanned Caesarean sections for the respondent’s last pregnancy lasting 7 or more months in the past five years. We calculated the proportion of deliveries occurring at non-hospital facilities in all the Indian states. FINDINGS: Using data from nearly 176,699 recent pregnancies, we found that 46.6% of India’s newborn deaths and 56.3% of stillbirths were among women who were ‘low risk’ according to national guidelines. Women classified as ‘low risk’ had a Caesarean section rate of 8.4% (95% CI 8.1–8.7%), marginally lower than the national average of 10.0% (95% CI 9.8–10.3%). In India as a whole, 32.0% (95% CI 31.5–32.5%) of deliveries occurred in facilities that were likely to lack advanced services. There was substantial variation across the country, with less than 5% non-hospital public facility deliveries in Punjab, Kerala, and Delhi compared to more than 40% in Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan. Newborn mortality tended to be lower in states with highest hospital delivery rates. INTERPRETATION: Individual risk stratification based on factors identified in pregnancy fails to accurately predict which women will have delivery complications and experience stillbirth and newborn death in India. Thus a determination of ‘low risk’ should not be used to guide women to health facilities lacking key life saving services, including Caesarean section, blood transfusion, and advanced newborn resuscitation and care. FUNDING: 10.13039/100000865Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the paper are entirely those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the Gates Foundation or of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10382663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103826632023-07-30 Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21 Tandon, Ajay Roder-DeWan, Sanam Chopra, Mickey Chhabra, Sheena Croke, Kevin Cros, Marion Hasan, Rifat Jammy, Guru Rajesh Manchanda, Navneet Nagaraj, Amith Pandey, Rahul Pradhan, Elina Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil Peters, Michael A. Kruk, Margaret E. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia Articles BACKGROUND: Despite substantial progress in improving maternal and newborn health, India continues to experience high rates of newborn mortality and stillbirths. One reason may be that many births happen in health facilities that lack advanced services—such as Caesarean section, blood transfusion, or newborn intensive care. Stratification based on pregnancy risk factors is used to guide ‘high-risk’ women to advanced facilities. To assess the utility of risk stratification for guiding the choice of facility, we estimated the frequency of adverse newborn outcomes among women classified as ‘low risk’ in India. METHODS: We used the 2019–21 Fifth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5)—India’s Demographic and Health Survey—which includes modules administered to women aged 15–49 years. In addition to pregnancy history and outcomes, the survey collected a range of risk factors, including biomarkers. We used national obstetric risk guidelines to classify women as ‘high risk’ versus ‘low risk’ and assessed the frequency of stillbirths, newborn deaths, and unplanned Caesarean sections for the respondent’s last pregnancy lasting 7 or more months in the past five years. We calculated the proportion of deliveries occurring at non-hospital facilities in all the Indian states. FINDINGS: Using data from nearly 176,699 recent pregnancies, we found that 46.6% of India’s newborn deaths and 56.3% of stillbirths were among women who were ‘low risk’ according to national guidelines. Women classified as ‘low risk’ had a Caesarean section rate of 8.4% (95% CI 8.1–8.7%), marginally lower than the national average of 10.0% (95% CI 9.8–10.3%). In India as a whole, 32.0% (95% CI 31.5–32.5%) of deliveries occurred in facilities that were likely to lack advanced services. There was substantial variation across the country, with less than 5% non-hospital public facility deliveries in Punjab, Kerala, and Delhi compared to more than 40% in Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan. Newborn mortality tended to be lower in states with highest hospital delivery rates. INTERPRETATION: Individual risk stratification based on factors identified in pregnancy fails to accurately predict which women will have delivery complications and experience stillbirth and newborn death in India. Thus a determination of ‘low risk’ should not be used to guide women to health facilities lacking key life saving services, including Caesarean section, blood transfusion, and advanced newborn resuscitation and care. FUNDING: 10.13039/100000865Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the paper are entirely those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the Gates Foundation or of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. Elsevier 2023-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10382663/ /pubmed/37521318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100253 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Tandon, Ajay
Roder-DeWan, Sanam
Chopra, Mickey
Chhabra, Sheena
Croke, Kevin
Cros, Marion
Hasan, Rifat
Jammy, Guru Rajesh
Manchanda, Navneet
Nagaraj, Amith
Pandey, Rahul
Pradhan, Elina
Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil
Peters, Michael A.
Kruk, Margaret E.
Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title_full Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title_fullStr Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title_full_unstemmed Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title_short Adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in India: findings from the Fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019–21
title_sort adverse birth outcomes among women with ‘low-risk’ pregnancies in india: findings from the fifth national family health survey, 2019–21
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100253
work_keys_str_mv AT tandonajay adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT roderdewansanam adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT chopramickey adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT chhabrasheena adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT crokekevin adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT crosmarion adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT hasanrifat adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT jammygururajesh adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT manchandanavneet adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT nagarajamith adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT pandeyrahul adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT pradhanelina adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT rajkumarandrewsunil adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT petersmichaela adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921
AT krukmargarete adversebirthoutcomesamongwomenwithlowriskpregnanciesinindiafindingsfromthefifthnationalfamilyhealthsurvey201921