Cargando…
From Computation to Clinic
Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011 |
_version_ | 1785080728820645888 |
---|---|
author | Yip, Sarah W. Barch, Deanna M. Chase, Henry W. Flagel, Shelly Huys, Quentin J.M. Konova, Anna B. Montague, Read Paulus, Martin |
author_facet | Yip, Sarah W. Barch, Deanna M. Chase, Henry W. Flagel, Shelly Huys, Quentin J.M. Konova, Anna B. Montague, Read Paulus, Martin |
author_sort | Yip, Sarah W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant understanding, primarily via back translation from clinic to computation, revealing how specific disorders or symptoms map onto specific computational processes. Nonetheless, forward translation, from computation to clinic, remains rare. In addition, consensus regarding specific barriers to forward translation—and on the best strategies to overcome these barriers—is limited. This perspective review brings together expert basic and computationally trained researchers and clinicians to 1) identify challenges specific to preclinical model systems and clinical translation of computational models of cognition and affect, and 2) discuss practical approaches to overcoming these challenges. In doing so, we highlight recent evidence for the ability of computational approaches to predict treatment responses in psychiatric disorders and discuss considerations for maximizing the clinical relevance of such models (e.g., via longitudinal testing) and the likelihood of stakeholder adoption (e.g., via cost-effectiveness analyses). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10382698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103826982023-07-30 From Computation to Clinic Yip, Sarah W. Barch, Deanna M. Chase, Henry W. Flagel, Shelly Huys, Quentin J.M. Konova, Anna B. Montague, Read Paulus, Martin Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci Review Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant understanding, primarily via back translation from clinic to computation, revealing how specific disorders or symptoms map onto specific computational processes. Nonetheless, forward translation, from computation to clinic, remains rare. In addition, consensus regarding specific barriers to forward translation—and on the best strategies to overcome these barriers—is limited. This perspective review brings together expert basic and computationally trained researchers and clinicians to 1) identify challenges specific to preclinical model systems and clinical translation of computational models of cognition and affect, and 2) discuss practical approaches to overcoming these challenges. In doing so, we highlight recent evidence for the ability of computational approaches to predict treatment responses in psychiatric disorders and discuss considerations for maximizing the clinical relevance of such models (e.g., via longitudinal testing) and the likelihood of stakeholder adoption (e.g., via cost-effectiveness analyses). Elsevier 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10382698/ /pubmed/37519475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of Society of Biological Psychiatry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Yip, Sarah W. Barch, Deanna M. Chase, Henry W. Flagel, Shelly Huys, Quentin J.M. Konova, Anna B. Montague, Read Paulus, Martin From Computation to Clinic |
title | From Computation to Clinic |
title_full | From Computation to Clinic |
title_fullStr | From Computation to Clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | From Computation to Clinic |
title_short | From Computation to Clinic |
title_sort | from computation to clinic |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yipsarahw fromcomputationtoclinic AT barchdeannam fromcomputationtoclinic AT chasehenryw fromcomputationtoclinic AT flagelshelly fromcomputationtoclinic AT huysquentinjm fromcomputationtoclinic AT konovaannab fromcomputationtoclinic AT montagueread fromcomputationtoclinic AT paulusmartin fromcomputationtoclinic |