Cargando…

From Computation to Clinic

Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yip, Sarah W., Barch, Deanna M., Chase, Henry W., Flagel, Shelly, Huys, Quentin J.M., Konova, Anna B., Montague, Read, Paulus, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011
_version_ 1785080728820645888
author Yip, Sarah W.
Barch, Deanna M.
Chase, Henry W.
Flagel, Shelly
Huys, Quentin J.M.
Konova, Anna B.
Montague, Read
Paulus, Martin
author_facet Yip, Sarah W.
Barch, Deanna M.
Chase, Henry W.
Flagel, Shelly
Huys, Quentin J.M.
Konova, Anna B.
Montague, Read
Paulus, Martin
author_sort Yip, Sarah W.
collection PubMed
description Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant understanding, primarily via back translation from clinic to computation, revealing how specific disorders or symptoms map onto specific computational processes. Nonetheless, forward translation, from computation to clinic, remains rare. In addition, consensus regarding specific barriers to forward translation—and on the best strategies to overcome these barriers—is limited. This perspective review brings together expert basic and computationally trained researchers and clinicians to 1) identify challenges specific to preclinical model systems and clinical translation of computational models of cognition and affect, and 2) discuss practical approaches to overcoming these challenges. In doing so, we highlight recent evidence for the ability of computational approaches to predict treatment responses in psychiatric disorders and discuss considerations for maximizing the clinical relevance of such models (e.g., via longitudinal testing) and the likelihood of stakeholder adoption (e.g., via cost-effectiveness analyses).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10382698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103826982023-07-30 From Computation to Clinic Yip, Sarah W. Barch, Deanna M. Chase, Henry W. Flagel, Shelly Huys, Quentin J.M. Konova, Anna B. Montague, Read Paulus, Martin Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci Review Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant understanding, primarily via back translation from clinic to computation, revealing how specific disorders or symptoms map onto specific computational processes. Nonetheless, forward translation, from computation to clinic, remains rare. In addition, consensus regarding specific barriers to forward translation—and on the best strategies to overcome these barriers—is limited. This perspective review brings together expert basic and computationally trained researchers and clinicians to 1) identify challenges specific to preclinical model systems and clinical translation of computational models of cognition and affect, and 2) discuss practical approaches to overcoming these challenges. In doing so, we highlight recent evidence for the ability of computational approaches to predict treatment responses in psychiatric disorders and discuss considerations for maximizing the clinical relevance of such models (e.g., via longitudinal testing) and the likelihood of stakeholder adoption (e.g., via cost-effectiveness analyses). Elsevier 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10382698/ /pubmed/37519475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of Society of Biological Psychiatry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yip, Sarah W.
Barch, Deanna M.
Chase, Henry W.
Flagel, Shelly
Huys, Quentin J.M.
Konova, Anna B.
Montague, Read
Paulus, Martin
From Computation to Clinic
title From Computation to Clinic
title_full From Computation to Clinic
title_fullStr From Computation to Clinic
title_full_unstemmed From Computation to Clinic
title_short From Computation to Clinic
title_sort from computation to clinic
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011
work_keys_str_mv AT yipsarahw fromcomputationtoclinic
AT barchdeannam fromcomputationtoclinic
AT chasehenryw fromcomputationtoclinic
AT flagelshelly fromcomputationtoclinic
AT huysquentinjm fromcomputationtoclinic
AT konovaannab fromcomputationtoclinic
AT montagueread fromcomputationtoclinic
AT paulusmartin fromcomputationtoclinic